<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dv-depot.com &#187; Flicker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dv-depot.com/tag/flicker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dv-depot.com</link>
	<description>The best in Gadgets &#38; Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:14:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some Thunderbolt MacBook Pros causing flicker on Cinema Displays, Apple investigates (video)</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/82129/some-thunderbolt-macbook-pros-causing-flicker-on-cinema-displays-apple-investigates-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/82129/some-thunderbolt-macbook-pros-causing-flicker-on-cinema-displays-apple-investigates-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 19:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Tech Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Break]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Causing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinema Displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Displayport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Adopter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware Engineers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inch Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replacement Machines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rustybrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[some]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sophisticated Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunderbolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Share]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/82129/some-thunderbolt-macbook-pros-causing-flicker-on-cinema-displays-apple-investigates-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a world of sophisticated electronics these days, there&#8217;s always risks to being an early adopter. Alas, it appears that our latest victims are owners of Apple&#8217;s Thunderbolt-laden MacBook Pros. Since launch, a number of frustrated customers have been reporting that their new unibody laptops &#8212; of all three sizes &#8212; are causing random flicker [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" style="display: none;" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/03/mbp-thunderbolt-03192011.jpg" /></div>
<p>
In a world of sophisticated electronics these days, there&#8217;s always risks to being an early adopter. Alas, it appears that our latest victims are owners of Apple&#8217;s Thunderbolt-laden MacBook Pros. Since launch, a number of frustrated customers have been reporting that their new unibody laptops &#8212; of all three sizes &#8212; are causing random flicker on both 24-inch and 27-inch Cinema Displays when connected via their Mini DisplayPort / Thunderbolt combo port, and now we have video proof to share the pain. Some also confirmed that even replacement machines from Apple are exhibiting the same behavior, though a source of ours says this doesn&#8217;t seem to be a widespread issue, and that the company&#8217;s hardware engineers are already looking into this. Either way, we&#8217;re likely to see a firmware fix for this bug soon &#8212; it&#8217;s no good having a large monitor constantly blinking at you. One more video after the break.</p>
<p>[Thanks, Armando]
<p>Continue reading <em>Some Thunderbolt MacBook Pros causing flicker on Cinema Displays, Apple investigates (video)</em></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;">Some Thunderbolt MacBook Pros causing flicker on Cinema Displays, Apple investigates (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:47:00 EDT.  Please see our terms for use of feeds.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p>Permalink&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption">Apple<!--//-->, sja3274 (YouTube)<!--//-->, rustybrick (YouTube)<!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.engadget.com%2F2011%2F03%2F19%2Fsome-thunderbolt-macbook-pros-causing-flicker-on-cinema-displays%2F&sref=rss">Engadget</a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/82129/some-thunderbolt-macbook-pros-causing-flicker-on-cinema-displays-apple-investigates-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gadgets You Can Buy As Gifts This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/70481/gadgets-you-can-buy-as-gifts-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/70481/gadgets-you-can-buy-as-gifts-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Video Recorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handheld Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minidv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Treo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious Moments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Feature Set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roomba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Handycam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet Pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Lot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/70481/gadgets-you-can-buy-as-gifts-this-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Choosing a gadget can be a complicated task. There are a huge number of gadget retailers, both online and off, and they offer a numbing array of items. If you&#8217;re looking to buy someone a gadget, a lot of your decision will depend on how much money you plan on spending. There are gadgets for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choosing a gadget can be a complicated task.  There are a huge number of gadget retailers, both online and off, and they offer a numbing array of items.  If you&#8217;re looking to buy someone a gadget, a lot of your decision will depend on how much money you plan on spending.  There are gadgets for every budget, and for every season.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a few gadgets that may be of interest:</p>
<p>Smartphones:   Smartphones are just that, phones with a whole lot of additional smart features.  SmartPhones are a new generation of handheld devices which allow you to make cellular and data calls with ease.  More powerful than some PDAs, SmartPhones threaten the entire PDA business.  The Palm Treo is a notable brand.</p>
<p>UMPCs &#8211; Ultra Mobile Personal Computers, also known as the Origami Form factor are geared for the market between PDAs and Laptops.  Smaller than laptops, they boast of longer lasting battery life and more software.  In fact, one of the main selling points of UMPCs is the fact they run Windows Tablet OS and are compatible with Office.  Microsoft and Intel championed the UMPC form factor initially to be offered in the $500-$1000 price range.  The reality is, the units will be closer to $1200.  Samsung is the first OEM to market with its&#8217;innovative Q1 UMPC.  They plan on offering it for sale in the US and most of the world in May 2006.  </p>
<p>Robots &#8211; Domesticated robots like the Roomba are quite a sensation.  People are definitely interested in the potential time saving qualities of robots.  Robots that mow the lawn and clean the house are now a reality.  In the future, more tasks will be assigned to robotic helpers. </p>
<p>Cameras and Camcorders &#8211; Sony Handycam has a very hot offering right now with it&#8217;s MiniDV Digital Video Recorders.  The units have excellent picture quality and shoot straight to mini-DVDs, which should play anywhere.  For the price, the HandyCam MiniDV has a rich feature set, which allows for flicker-free filming.  You can&#8217;t beat a camcorder for capturing precious moments.  </p>
<p>Tablet PCs and PDAs &#8211; Although feeling pressure from the UMPCs and SmartPhones, PDAs and Tablet PCs are still a popular item. </p>
<p>Blackberry and Palms are still extremely popular PDAs, and Blackberry has over 2 million people using its&#8217; commercial email service.  Tablet PCs carry a hefty price-tag, but have excellent features like hand-writing recognition.  In fact, use of the stylus is natural, and anyone with an artistic bent would seemingly love this device.</p>
<p>Any of the above items would make an excellent gift for a gadget enthusiast.  The main thing to do is consider the person&#8217;s lifestyle before making a purchase.  Since almost all gadgets carry relatively high price tags, it&#8217;s worth finding out for sure what the person wants, or you run the risk of making an expensive mistake.  Check all gadgets for the presence of extras, such as service plans, that aren&#8217;t included in the purchase price.</p>
<div style="margin:5px;padding:5px;border:1px solid #c1c1c1;font-size: 10px;">
<p>Please visit the <a rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/article_exit_link');" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.planet-gadgets.com%2F&sref=rss">Gadgets Blog</a> at <a rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/article_exit_link');" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.planet-gadgets.com%2F&sref=rss">Planet Gadgets</a></p>
</div>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/70481/gadgets-you-can-buy-as-gifts-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung UN46B8500 46-Inch 1080p 240 Hz LED HDTV</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/70061/samsung-un46b8500-46-inch-1080p-240-hz-led-hdtv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/70061/samsung-un46b8500-46-inch-1080p-240-hz-led-hdtv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 05:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[46Inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countless Hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dlna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamic Contrast Ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Memory Usb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdmi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hdtvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impressive Contrast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Led Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion Blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduction Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stunning Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tv Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[un46b8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/70061/samsung-un46b8500-46-inch-1080p-240-hz-led-hdtv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7,000,000:1 Dynamic Contrast Ratio Auto Motion Plus 240Hz Medi@2.0 Internet@TV &#8211; Content Service; DLNA Wireless; Content Library (2GB Flash Memory); USB 2.0 Movie Fast 2ms response time 4 HDMI — Anynet+ (HDMI-CEC) (side) Product DescriptionPicture performance, advanced connectivity, and an eco-friendly and stunning design come together to form Samsung LED TV 8500. For the image [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSamsung-UN46B8500-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV%2Fdp%2FB002HDZNIM%253FSubscriptionId%253D0YPKRD1HKXWDEA3MS9R2%2526tag%253Ddv-depot-20%2526linkCode%253Dxm2%2526camp%253D2025%2526creative%253D165953%2526creativeASIN%253DB002HDZNIM&sref=rss" rel="nofollow"><img style="float:left;margin: 0 20px 10px 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51T1XHdCKAL._SL160_.jpg" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>7,000,000:1 Dynamic Contrast Ratio</li>
<li>Auto Motion Plus 240Hz</li>
<li>Medi@2.0 Internet@TV &#8211; Content Service; DLNA Wireless; Content Library (2GB Flash Memory); USB 2.0 Movie</li>
<li>Fast 2ms response time</li>
<li>4 HDMI — Anynet+ (HDMI-CEC) (side)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Product Description</b><br />Picture performance, advanced connectivity, and an eco-friendly and stunning design come together to form Samsung LED TV 8500. For the image connoisseur, our highest 240Hz motion blur reduction technology, our highest 7,000,000:1 Dynamic Contrast Ratio that displays incredibly deep blacks and pristine whites, and enriched color processing deliver outstanding video. Samsung Internet@TV has web TV widgets from Yahoo, Flicker, Ebay and others to entertain, inform and connect you to specially designed web content right on your LED TV. This Ultra Slim 1.6” depth set is the ideal complement for your room and your life.innovative digital technology. Powerful LED technology offers the most impressive contrast and color you have ever seen on a 55-inch screen; innovative 240Hz technology renders four times the frames per second compared to standard HDTVs, for motion that’s truly lifelike and smooth. A pre-loaded Content Library puts countless hours of informatio&#8230; <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSamsung-UN46B8500-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV%2Fdp%2FB002HDZNIM%253FSubscriptionId%253D0YPKRD1HKXWDEA3MS9R2%2526tag%253Ddv-depot-20%2526linkCode%253Dxm2%2526camp%253D2025%2526creative%253D165953%2526creativeASIN%253DB002HDZNIM&sref=rss" rel="nofollow">More >></a></p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSamsung-UN46B8500-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV%2Fdp%2FB002HDZNIM%253FSubscriptionId%253D0YPKRD1HKXWDEA3MS9R2%2526tag%253Ddv-depot-20%2526linkCode%253Dxm2%2526camp%253D2025%2526creative%253D165953%2526creativeASIN%253DB002HDZNIM&sref=rss" title="Samsung UN46B8500 46-Inch 1080p 240 Hz LED HDTV" rel="nofollow"><b>Samsung UN46B8500 46-Inch 1080p 240 Hz LED HDTV</b></a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/70061/samsung-un46b8500-46-inch-1080p-240-hz-led-hdtv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung UN55B8000 55-Inch 1080p 240 Hz LED HDTV</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/69499/samsung-un55b8000-55-inch-1080p-240-hz-led-hdtv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/69499/samsung-un55b8000-55-inch-1080p-240-hz-led-hdtv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 21:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55Inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband Connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connoisseur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Audio Output]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamic Contrast Ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdmi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lcd Tvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Led Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion Blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduction Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung un55b8000 hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stunning Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True To Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN55B8000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[un55b8000 hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/69499/samsung-un55b8000-55-inch-1080p-240-hz-led-hdtv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ultra-slim 55-inch LED HDTV with full HD 1080p resolution and Auto Motion Plus 240Hz technology for the sharpest, smoothest picture possible LED technology enables a true-to-life range of picture brightness; uses 40 percent less energy than conventional LCD TVs Internet@TV online content service from Yahoo!, Flickr, YouTube via your broadband connection Inputs: 4 HDMI, 1 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSamsung-UN55B8000-55-Inch-1080p-HDTV%2Fdp%2FB0028YB8MA%253FSubscriptionId%253D0YPKRD1HKXWDEA3MS9R2%2526tag%253Ddv-depot-20%2526linkCode%253Dxm2%2526camp%253D2025%2526creative%253D165953%2526creativeASIN%253DB0028YB8MA&sref=rss" rel="nofollow"><img style="float:left;margin: 0 20px 10px 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51fLTGoYGHL._SL160_.jpg" /></a></p>
<ul>
<li>Ultra-slim 55-inch LED HDTV with full HD 1080p resolution and Auto Motion Plus 240Hz technology for the sharpest, smoothest picture possible</li>
<li>LED technology enables a true-to-life range of picture brightness; uses 40 percent less energy than conventional LCD TVs</li>
<li>Internet@TV online content service from Yahoo!, Flickr, YouTube via your broadband connection</li>
<li>Inputs: 4 HDMI, 1 component, 2 USB, 1 Ethernet, 1 PC, 1 optical digital audio output</li>
<li>Includes detachable swivel table stand; measures 52 x 33.9 x 12.1 inches (WxHxD) with stand</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Product Description</b><br />Picture performance, advanced connectivity, and an eco-friendly and stunning design come together to form Samsung LED TV 8000. For the image connoisseur, our highest 240Hz motion blur reduction technology, a 5,000,000:1 Dynamic Contrast Ratio that displays incredibly deep blacks and pristine whites, and enriched color processing deliver outstanding video. Samsung LED TVs use 40% less power than conventional LCD TVs and are manufactured with the environment in mind. Internet@TV has web TV widgets from Yahoo, Flicker, Ebay and others to entertain, inform and connect you to specially designed web content right on your LED TV. This Ultra Slim 1.2” depth set is the ideal complement for your room and your life&#8230;. <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSamsung-UN55B8000-55-Inch-1080p-HDTV%2Fdp%2FB0028YB8MA%253FSubscriptionId%253D0YPKRD1HKXWDEA3MS9R2%2526tag%253Ddv-depot-20%2526linkCode%253Dxm2%2526camp%253D2025%2526creative%253D165953%2526creativeASIN%253DB0028YB8MA&sref=rss" rel="nofollow">More >></a></p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FSamsung-UN55B8000-55-Inch-1080p-HDTV%2Fdp%2FB0028YB8MA%253FSubscriptionId%253D0YPKRD1HKXWDEA3MS9R2%2526tag%253Ddv-depot-20%2526linkCode%253Dxm2%2526camp%253D2025%2526creative%253D165953%2526creativeASIN%253DB0028YB8MA&sref=rss" title="Samsung UN55B8000 55-Inch 1080p 240 Hz LED HDTV" rel="nofollow"><b>Samsung UN55B8000 55-Inch 1080p 240 Hz LED HDTV</b></a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/69499/samsung-un55b8000-55-inch-1080p-240-hz-led-hdtv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Faulty iMac Saga, Chapter 5: The Moment of Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/45795/the-faulty-imac-saga-chapter-5-the-moment-of-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/45795/the-faulty-imac-saga-chapter-5-the-moment-of-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>othertech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[modo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breakthrough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conclusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dozens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faulty imac saga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firmware Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickering imacs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiatus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imacs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inch Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mdash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moment Of Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Imac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quirks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sticker Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yellow imacs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yellow Screens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Gizmodo-5468824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/02/500x_imac10.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The iMac's notorious flickering problem has been solved through a firmware update. And after a few weeks' hiatus, Apple has continued shipping 27-inch iMacs. This may be it.</p><h1>Can You Safely Buy a New iMac Yet?</h1>
<p>Nope, but you might be able to next week.</p>
<h1>Why?</h1>
<p>There are two noted problems with iMacs&#8212;the 27-inch models in particular. First is an issue where their <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2212682&#38;tstart=30">screens flicker</a>. Apple released <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431482/firmware-update-for-27+inch-imacs-to-fix-flickering-screens">a firmware update</a> for the problem, but it didn't seem to fix it. However, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5461902/apples-second-firmware-update-for-27+inch-imacs-supposedly-fixes-flickering-screens">the second firmware update</a> looks to have been more successful. How successful?</p>
<p>Combing through about 30 pages of <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2212682&#38;start=3960&#38;tstart=0">this thread</a> (thanks Kyle), dozens have found the second update successful&#8212;and similar threads have come to similar conclusions. A few outliers still exist, but the vast consensus seems to be that the issue is nullified when the update is properly installed.</p>
<p>So it looks like <strong>the flickering problem is fixed for most users</strong>. This is great news&#8212;a huge breakthrough in this whole saga. If your iMac is still flickering after the update, call up Apple and demand new hardware. It finally seems safe to say, you're probably in the minority.</p>
<p>But the existing, huge question mark is regarding the <a href="http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2218213&#38;tstart=45&#38;start=15">yellow</a> screens. Are these fixed yet? Apple <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5453662/apple-puts-massive-delay-on-27+inch-imac-shipments">halted production lines</a> in what we assumed as an attempt to solve the yellow screen problems (among other iMac quirks). Now <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5467720/imac-27-shipping-again">they're shipping</a> new 27-inch iMacs again.</p>
<p>Theoretically, the yellow screens could be behind us. But until customers actually receive and test these iMacs, we don't know if Apple was able to solve whatever problems are going on.</p>
<p>Apple most certainly hasn't made claims either way.</p>
<h1>What Ever Happened With Those Apple Pay-outs</h1>
<p>We received reports from the UK, and then the US, that Apple was essentially buying back faulty iMacs for 15% over the sticker price. It was until later, however, that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5464288/apple-paying-out-15-on-broken-27+inch-imacs">we learned the catch</a>. What once looked like a pretty great deal turned out, well, mediocre. The 15% was a flat payback rate that was meant to cover both tax and shipping. We assume it covered purchasing expenses, but a money hand-out it was not. It's also worth mentioning that this deal was handed out sporadically, and I'm not sure it's still being offered to customers at all.</p>
<h1>Quote of the Week</h1>
<p>"[Apple] said they can issue me a refund via check that'll come 4-6 weeks. That's nearly $2600 of my money they're going to hold for over 2 months since the day I paid for this messed up computer."</p>
<h1>Apple Is All In</h1>
<p>So this is it, the big moment of truth. Without official word, we are forced to interpret the delivery freezes as both a silent admission that there were problems with iMacs and an attempt to fix them. But who knows if Apple actually solved the yellow screens. Especially if the source of the issue is really in the LG panel itself&#8212;which some suspect given similar complaints with <a href="http://en.community.dell.com/forums/t/19302919.aspx">similar Dell monitors</a>&#8212;it's possible that Apple can't cure the jaundice without raising hell down at the factory, or shopping for another supplier. (This problem shouldn't be the consumer's inconvenience, of course.) We won't know until we see the latest iMacs in the wild.</p>
<p>We've got a lot of sources&#8212;retail/repair spies, plenty of tipsters who are on their third or fourth faulty iMac and, of course, all of you&#8212;just waiting to share their replacement experiences. Tip us at submissions@gizmodo.com and join in.</p>
<p>Apple, I hope we can put these problems behind us because neither of us wants to see how bad that apple on the table can rot.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/02/500x_imac10.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The iMac&#8217;s notorious flickering problem has been solved through a firmware update. And after a few weeks&#8217; hiatus, Apple has continued shipping 27-inch iMacs. This may be it.</p>
<h1>Can You Safely Buy a New iMac Yet?</h1>
<p>Nope, but you might be able to next week.</p>
<h1>Why?</h1>
<p>There are two noted problems with iMacs&mdash;the 27-inch models in particular. First is an issue where their <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscussions.apple.com%2Fthread.jspa%3FthreadID%3D2212682%26%23038%3Btstart%3D30&sref=rss">screens flicker</a>. Apple released <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5431482%2Ffirmware-update-for-27%2Binch-imacs-to-fix-flickering-screens&sref=rss">a firmware update</a> for the problem, but it didn&#8217;t seem to fix it. However, <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5461902%2Fapples-second-firmware-update-for-27%2Binch-imacs-supposedly-fixes-flickering-screens&sref=rss">the second firmware update</a> looks to have been more successful. How successful?</p>
<p>Combing through about 30 pages of <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscussions.apple.com%2Fthread.jspa%3FthreadID%3D2212682%26%23038%3Bstart%3D3960%26%23038%3Btstart%3D0&sref=rss">this thread</a> (thanks Kyle), dozens have found the second update successful&mdash;and similar threads have come to similar conclusions. A few outliers still exist, but the vast consensus seems to be that the issue is nullified when the update is properly installed.</p>
<p>So it looks like <strong>the flickering problem is fixed for most users</strong>. This is great news&mdash;a huge breakthrough in this whole saga. If your iMac is still flickering after the update, call up Apple and demand new hardware. It finally seems safe to say, you&#8217;re probably in the minority.</p>
<p>But the existing, huge question mark is regarding the <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscussions.info.apple.com%2Fthread.jspa%3FthreadID%3D2218213%26%23038%3Btstart%3D45%26%23038%3Bstart%3D15&sref=rss">yellow</a> screens. Are these fixed yet? Apple <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5453662%2Fapple-puts-massive-delay-on-27%2Binch-imac-shipments&sref=rss">halted production lines</a> in what we assumed as an attempt to solve the yellow screen problems (among other iMac quirks). Now <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5467720%2Fimac-27-shipping-again&sref=rss">they&#8217;re shipping</a> new 27-inch iMacs again.</p>
<p>Theoretically, the yellow screens could be behind us. But until customers actually receive and test these iMacs, we don&#8217;t know if Apple was able to solve whatever problems are going on.</p>
<p>Apple most certainly hasn&#8217;t made claims either way.</p>
<h1>What Ever Happened With Those Apple Pay-outs</h1>
<p>We received reports from the UK, and then the US, that Apple was essentially buying back faulty iMacs for 15% over the sticker price. It was until later, however, that <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5464288%2Fapple-paying-out-15-on-broken-27%2Binch-imacs&sref=rss">we learned the catch</a>. What once looked like a pretty great deal turned out, well, mediocre. The 15% was a flat payback rate that was meant to cover both tax and shipping. We assume it covered purchasing expenses, but a money hand-out it was not. It&#8217;s also worth mentioning that this deal was handed out sporadically, and I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s still being offered to customers at all.</p>
<h1>Quote of the Week</h1>
<p>&#8220;[Apple] said they can issue me a refund via check that&#8217;ll come 4-6 weeks. That&#8217;s nearly $2600 of my money they&#8217;re going to hold for over 2 months since the day I paid for this messed up computer.&#8221;</p>
<h1>Apple Is All In</h1>
<p>So this is it, the big moment of truth. Without official word, we are forced to interpret the delivery freezes as both a silent admission that there were problems with iMacs and an attempt to fix them. But who knows if Apple actually solved the yellow screens. Especially if the source of the issue is really in the LG panel itself&mdash;which some suspect given similar complaints with <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.community.dell.com%2Fforums%2Ft%2F19302919.aspx&sref=rss">similar Dell monitors</a>&mdash;it&#8217;s possible that Apple can&#8217;t cure the jaundice without raising hell down at the factory, or shopping for another supplier. (This problem shouldn&#8217;t be the consumer&#8217;s inconvenience, of course.) We won&#8217;t know until we see the latest iMacs in the wild.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve got a lot of sources&mdash;retail/repair spies, plenty of tipsters who are on their third or fourth faulty iMac and, of course, all of you&mdash;just waiting to share their replacement experiences. Tip us at submissions@gizmodo.com and join in.</p>
<p>Apple, I hope we can put these problems behind us because neither of us wants to see how bad that apple on the table can rot.</p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/45795/the-faulty-imac-saga-chapter-5-the-moment-of-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Archos 9 tablet gives Win7 the finger, turns to Google Chrome OS</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/37767/this-archos-9-tablet-gives-win7-the-finger-turns-to-google-chrome-os/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/37767/this-archos-9-tablet-gives-win7-the-finger-turns-to-google-chrome-os/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>othertech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crunchgear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archos 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bragging Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pros And Cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pros Cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screen Keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startup Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Touchscreen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=130381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/chromeos1.jpg"/>Apparently someone took the very new Archos 9 tablet and installed the early build of Google Chrome OS on it. Here are the pros and cons from where I sit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.crunchgear.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F12%2Fchromeos1.jpg&sref=rss"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-130388" title="chromeos" src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/chromeos1.jpg" alt="chromeos" width="620" height="345" /></a></p>
<p>Apparently someone took the very new Archos 9 tablet and installed the early build of Google Chrome OS on it. Here are the pros and cons from where I sit.</p>
<p>Pros: The quick startup time and the bragging rights as the first one to install Chrome OS on the device.</p>
<p>Cons: Chrome OS doesn&#8217;t support the touchscreen, nor have an on-screen keyboard so you&#8217;re kind of tied to a keyboard and mouse.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fumpcportal%2F4194687715%2Fin%2Fphotostream%2F&sref=rss">Flicker</a> via <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashgear.com%2Farchos-9-dumps-win7-for-google-chromium-os-1866379%2F&sref=rss">SlashGear</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedads.g.doubleclick.net%2F%7Eat%2FJjqHSrwKsq6ageClJqDimZWTZwo%2F0%2Fda&sref=rss"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JjqHSrwKsq6ageClJqDimZWTZwo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedads.g.doubleclick.net%2F%7Eat%2FJjqHSrwKsq6ageClJqDimZWTZwo%2F1%2Fda&sref=rss"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JjqHSrwKsq6ageClJqDimZWTZwo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2Fcrunchgear%3Fa%3DLtqlOwumsQ8%3Asoundm_jqac%3AV_sGLiPBpWU&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?i=LtqlOwumsQ8:soundm_jqac:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2Fcrunchgear%3Fa%3DLtqlOwumsQ8%3Asoundm_jqac%3AF7zBnMyn0Lo&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?i=LtqlOwumsQ8:soundm_jqac:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2Fcrunchgear%3Fa%3DLtqlOwumsQ8%3Asoundm_jqac%3AyIl2AUoC8zA&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a>
</div>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/37767/this-archos-9-tablet-gives-win7-the-finger-turns-to-google-chrome-os/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3D Hits Home: Snap Judgments on 3 Different Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/25627/3d-hits-home-snap-judgments-on-3-different-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/25627/3d-hits-home-snap-judgments-on-3-different-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>othertech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[modo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d Objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d tvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedia 09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedia 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gd-463d10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inch Plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instantaneous Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jvc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left Eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mdash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic Plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plasma Display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Response Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharpness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snap Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Gizmodo-5357383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/3dguy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_3dguy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>With the the big 3D push coming in 2010, I planted my eyes on three types of 3D technologies displayed at CEDIA (home theater expo) that you may have in your next TV...and passed some judgments without pulling any punches.</p>

<p>It should be noted, all designs require glasses. (More technical background on the types of glasses <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5084121/giz-explains-3d-technologies">here</a>.)</p>
<p><strong>Panasonic's 3D Plasma Concept</strong><br />
<em>The Tech</em>: Plasma with Active Shutter (alternating left eye, right eye progressive frames)<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_0881.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSC_0881.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>As a baseline reference to get our bearings, I took yet another look at Panasonic's 103-inch plasma display that we've seen <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342104/3d-tv-blu+ray-looks-great-but-whats-next">twice</a> before. My <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5125971/panasonic-3dhd-decent-3d-video-thats-as-impractical-as-any-3d-ever">original impressions stand</a>. It's decent&#8212;and definitely the best technology of the three that we saw at CEDIA. Why? There's virtually no flicker in the image because of plasma's instantaneous response times/ability to push legitimate high frame rates. Plus, it probably helps that we're talking about a 103-inch display (that has its own trailer). The bigger a 3D display, the better the illusion. But glasses aside, it's not what I'd deem a perfect experience. You see ghosting around some objects. And...OK, I still can't ignore the damned glasses. It creates an inherent distance from the image inducing an unintentionally ephemeral viewing experience.</p>
<p><strong>Sony's LCD Concept</strong><br />
<em>The Tech</em>: 240Hz LCD with Active Shutter (alternating left eye, right eye progressive frames)<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/sonyhd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_sonyhd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Even Panasonic will tell you that 240Hz is the baseline speed needed for an LCD to pull off 3D. But you know what? 240Hz isn't enough. Watching Pixar's <em>Up</em>, the color and sharpness are both great, but there's an absurd level of flicker that's nominally better than on old timey crank projector. And on this normal-sized LCD, it's incredibly obvious when 3D objects break the illusion by reaching the TV's frame. Granted, we're not talking about a final product here, but the specs seem pretty much identical to what consumers can expect to see in the high-end display market next year.</p>
<p><strong>JVC's GD-463D10 LCD</strong><br />
<em>The Tech</em>: Polarized filter (two images are interlaced on the screen, each eye sees half the data, glasses don't need power)<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_0853.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSC_0853.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Of the three technologies here, JVC's is the only final product that's actually available now. And it costs $9,153. It's also easily the worst of the three&#8212;completely unwatchable, in fact. The interlaced 3D means that the resolution takes a huge hit. But it's worse than just a 1080i picture. Your brain can almost make out these lines. I could say more about the tech, but I honestly couldn't stand to look at the screen for more than 10 seconds at once. Oh, and the kicker? For nine thousand bucks, you still only get two pairs of the cheap, polarized glasses. Sorry kids, Mommy and Daddy are watching TV tonight.</p>
<p>There's no doubt that some home theater enthusiasts will go out and plop down $5k or more on a commercially available 3D display when they enter the TV lines of major manufacturers like Sony and Panasonic in 2010. But I'm hoping, really hoping, that the public can resist the gimmick until the technology is perfected. To me, that means when we don't need to deal with these silly glasses at all. But for whatever it's worth, plasma is definitely looking like the clear front runner in execution. [<a href="http://blogs.amctv.com/future-of-classic/creature.jpg">Image</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2Fgizmodo%2F2009%2F09%2F3dguy.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_3dguy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>With the the big 3D push coming in 2010, I planted my eyes on three types of 3D technologies displayed at CEDIA (home theater expo) that you may have in your next TV&#8230;and passed some judgments without pulling any punches.</p>
<p>It should be noted, all designs require glasses. (More technical background on the types of glasses <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5084121%2Fgiz-explains-3d-technologies&sref=rss">here</a>.)</p>
<p><strong>Panasonic&#8217;s 3D Plasma Concept</strong><br />
<em>The Tech</em>: Plasma with Active Shutter (alternating left eye, right eye progressive frames)<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2Fgizmodo%2F2009%2F09%2FDSC_0881.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSC_0881.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>As a baseline reference to get our bearings, I took yet another look at Panasonic&#8217;s 103-inch plasma display that we&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5342104%2F3d-tv-blu%2Bray-looks-great-but-whats-next&sref=rss">twice</a> before. My <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5125971%2Fpanasonic-3dhd-decent-3d-video-thats-as-impractical-as-any-3d-ever&sref=rss">original impressions stand</a>. It&#8217;s decent&mdash;and definitely the best technology of the three that we saw at CEDIA. Why? There&#8217;s virtually no flicker in the image because of plasma&#8217;s instantaneous response times/ability to push legitimate high frame rates. Plus, it probably helps that we&#8217;re talking about a 103-inch display (that has its own trailer). The bigger a 3D display, the better the illusion. But glasses aside, it&#8217;s not what I&#8217;d deem a perfect experience. You see ghosting around some objects. And&#8230;OK, I still can&#8217;t ignore the damned glasses. It creates an inherent distance from the image inducing an unintentionally ephemeral viewing experience.</p>
<p><strong>Sony&#8217;s LCD Concept</strong><br />
<em>The Tech</em>: 240Hz LCD with Active Shutter (alternating left eye, right eye progressive frames)<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2Fgizmodo%2F2009%2F09%2Fsonyhd.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_sonyhd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Even Panasonic will tell you that 240Hz is the baseline speed needed for an LCD to pull off 3D. But you know what? 240Hz isn&#8217;t enough. Watching Pixar&#8217;s <em>Up</em>, the color and sharpness are both great, but there&#8217;s an absurd level of flicker that&#8217;s nominally better than on old timey crank projector. And on this normal-sized LCD, it&#8217;s incredibly obvious when 3D objects break the illusion by reaching the TV&#8217;s frame. Granted, we&#8217;re not talking about a final product here, but the specs seem pretty much identical to what consumers can expect to see in the high-end display market next year.</p>
<p><strong>JVC&#8217;s GD-463D10 LCD</strong><br />
<em>The Tech</em>: Polarized filter (two images are interlaced on the screen, each eye sees half the data, glasses don&#8217;t need power)<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2Fgizmodo%2F2009%2F09%2FDSC_0853.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSC_0853.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Of the three technologies here, JVC&#8217;s is the only final product that&#8217;s actually available now. And it costs $9,153. It&#8217;s also easily the worst of the three&mdash;completely unwatchable, in fact. The interlaced 3D means that the resolution takes a huge hit. But it&#8217;s worse than just a 1080i picture. Your brain can almost make out these lines. I could say more about the tech, but I honestly couldn&#8217;t stand to look at the screen for more than 10 seconds at once. Oh, and the kicker? For nine thousand bucks, you still only get two pairs of the cheap, polarized glasses. Sorry kids, Mommy and Daddy are watching TV tonight.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that some home theater enthusiasts will go out and plop down $5k or more on a commercially available 3D display when they enter the TV lines of major manufacturers like Sony and Panasonic in 2010. But I&#8217;m hoping, really hoping, that the public can resist the gimmick until the technology is perfected. To me, that means when we don&#8217;t need to deal with these silly glasses at all. But for whatever it&#8217;s worth, plasma is definitely looking like the clear front runner in execution. [<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.amctv.com%2Ffuture-of-classic%2Fcreature.jpg&sref=rss">Image</a>]</p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/25627/3d-hits-home-snap-judgments-on-3-different-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phantom v12.1 High-Speed Camera Can Capture 6,933 FPS at 720P</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/24075/phantom-v12-1-high-speed-camera-can-capture-6933-fps-at-720p/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/24075/phantom-v12-1-high-speed-camera-can-capture-6933-fps-at-720p/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>othertech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohgiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[720p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternating Current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cmos Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Video Recorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital-Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film And Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hd Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Speed Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Speed Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Speed Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Speed Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting Tidbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phantom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Successes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tv Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vision Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=29085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
By Andrew Liszewski
Need another reason to pick up the FlashBox digital video recorder I wrote about yesterday? Well here it is. The Phantom v12.1 CMOS-based high-speed digital camera is capable of capturing a whopping 6,933 frames per second at a resolution of 1280 x 720. According to Ben Cain&#8217;s HD CINEMA blog, the Phantom high-speed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ohgizmo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/phantom_v12_1.jpg" alt="Phantom v12.1 (Image courtesy Vision Research)" title="phantom_v12_1" width="500" height="377" class="aligntop" /><br />
By Andrew Liszewski</p>
<p>Need another reason to pick up the FlashBox digital video recorder I wrote about yesterday? Well here it is. The Phantom v12.1 CMOS-based high-speed digital camera is capable of capturing a whopping 6,933 frames per second at a resolution of 1280 x 720. According to <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhd-cinema.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fphantom-v12.html&sref=rss">Ben Cain&#8217;s HD CINEMA blog</a>, the Phantom high-speed cameras where originally developed by Vision Research with the military in mind, but have been adopted by the film and TV industries for high-speed photography with great success.</p>
<p>Now shooting HD footage at almost 7,000 fps isn&#8217;t quite as easy as shooting with a consumer-level HD camera, but Ben has posted his <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhd-cinema.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fphantom-v12.html&sref=rss">recent experiences</a> and successes with using the Phantom v12.1 on a high-speed shoot for Starz on his <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhd-cinema.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fphantom-v12.html&sref=rss">blog</a>. Interesting tidbit, it&#8217;s apparently better to use massive 5K lights on a high-speed shoot instead of 2Ks because you can actually see the light cool slightly in-between the alternating current&#8217;s 60 cycles on the high-speed footage, causing flicker. 5K lights on the other hand burn hot enough that their intensity isn&#8217;t visibly reduced in-between cycles. Crazy!</p>
<p>[ <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.visionresearch.com%2Findex.cfm%3Fsector%3Dhtm%2Ffiles%26%23038%3Bpage%3DPhantom_v12&sref=rss">Phantom v12.1</a> ] VIA [ <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fhd-cinema.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fphantom-v12.html&sref=rss">HD CINEMA</a> ]</p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedads.g.doubleclick.net%2F%7Ea%2FQKG-lpbLckMCDRD_eYeETO4Dayo%2F0%2Fda&sref=rss"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QKG-lpbLckMCDRD_eYeETO4Dayo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedads.g.doubleclick.net%2F%7Ea%2FQKG-lpbLckMCDRD_eYeETO4Dayo%2F1%2Fda&sref=rss"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QKG-lpbLckMCDRD_eYeETO4Dayo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DwKOuKOOsoYM%3AbtaqI9oHD-w%3AI2FUP0JpNAM&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?i=wKOuKOOsoYM:btaqI9oHD-w:I2FUP0JpNAM" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DwKOuKOOsoYM%3AbtaqI9oHD-w%3AQXVau8BzmBE&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?d=QXVau8BzmBE" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DwKOuKOOsoYM%3AbtaqI9oHD-w%3AyIl2AUoC8zA&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DwKOuKOOsoYM%3AbtaqI9oHD-w%3AdnMXMwOfBR0&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DwKOuKOOsoYM%3AbtaqI9oHD-w%3AaKCwKftKxY0&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?i=wKOuKOOsoYM:btaqI9oHD-w:aKCwKftKxY0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DwKOuKOOsoYM%3AbtaqI9oHD-w%3A7Q72WNTAKBA&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DwKOuKOOsoYM%3AbtaqI9oHD-w%3AD7DqB2pKExk&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?i=wKOuKOOsoYM:btaqI9oHD-w:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ohgizmo/~4/wKOuKOOsoYM" height="1" width="1"/></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/24075/phantom-v12-1-high-speed-camera-can-capture-6933-fps-at-720p/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists attempting to harness &#8216;pee power&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/18840/scientists-attempting-to-harness-pee-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/18840/scientists-attempting-to-harness-pee-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrogen Atoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10284239-48.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
                    
                            <p><div class="cnet-image-div image-large float-none" style="width: 610px;"><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090710/3427222507_a7c8ba057e_o.jpg" alt="truck carrying portable toilets" width="610" height="308" /><p class="image-caption">Umm...fill &#39;er up?</p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thisisbossi/3427222507/">Flicker/thisisbossi</a>)</span></div></p>

<p>Scientists from Ohio University have come across a way to harvest large amounts of cheap hydrogen from a rather unlikely source: urine. Apparently, plucking hydrogen atoms from urine is much easier than getting it from water.</p>

<p>Gerardine Botte, one of the Ohio ...</p> <p>Originally posted at <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10284239-48.html" class="origPostedBlog">The Car Tech blog</a></p>
                        
                ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="cnet-image-div image-large float-none" style="width: 610px;" ><img class="cnet-image" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090710/3427222507_a7c8ba057e_o.jpg" alt="truck carrying portable toilets" width="610" height="308" />
<p class="image-caption">Umm&#8230;fill &#39;er up?</p>
<p><span class="image-credit">(Credit: <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fthisisbossi%2F3427222507%2F&sref=rss" >Flicker/thisisbossi</a>)</span></div>
</p>
<p>Scientists from Ohio University have come across a way to harvest large amounts of cheap hydrogen from a rather unlikely source: urine. Apparently, plucking hydrogen atoms from urine is much easier than getting it from water.</p>
<p>Gerardine Botte, one of the Ohio &#8230;</p>
<p>Originally posted at <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Freviews.cnet.com%2F8301-13746_7-10284239-48.html&sref=rss" class="origPostedBlog">The Car Tech blog</a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/18840/scientists-attempting-to-harness-pee-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nike’s T90 Ascente football: So damn advanced they might as well throw Google Chrome OS on it</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/18804/nike%e2%80%99s-t90-ascente-football-so-damn-advanced-they-might-as-well-throw-google-chrome-os-on-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/18804/nike%e2%80%99s-t90-ascente-football-so-damn-advanced-they-might-as-well-throw-google-chrome-os-on-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>othertech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crunchgear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ascente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball Bat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullet Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football Leagues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray Winter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Half Life 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maximum Speeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike Footballs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pique Your Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premier League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quaresma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soccer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweet Spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=99965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img />New season, new ball. The three big football leagues&#8212;England's Premier League, Spain's La Liga, and Italy's Serie A&#8212;begin in just a few weeks, and Nike has developed a fancy, new ball that's loaded with all types of hi-tech goodness that may pique your interest. It's called the T90 Ascente. Goalkeepers will hate it; flashy forwards will love it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/t90.jpg" alt="t90" title="t90" width="630" height="329" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-99967" /></p>
<p>New season, new ball. The three big football leagues&mdash;England&#8217;s Premier League, Spain&#8217;s La Liga, and Italy&#8217;s Serie A&mdash;begin in just a few weeks, and Nike has developed a fancy, new ball for them that&#8217;s loaded with all types of hi-tech goodness that may pique your interest. It&#8217;s called the <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nike.com%2Fnikeos%2Fp%2Fnikefootball%2Fen_GB%2Ft90_ascente&sref=rss">T90 Ascente</a>. Goalkeepers will hate it; flashy forwards will love it.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s so damn special about the ball? The Nike bullet points are: “360 Sweet Spot,” “Longer Range,” “Increased Visibility,” “Higher Accuracy,” and “Greater Speed.”</p>
<p>Breaking those down, the “360 Sweet Spot” refers to the way the ball reacts to being kicked. Usually, footballs have a “sweet spot,” like the “meat” of a baseball bat, that you&#8217;re trained to hit for maximum speeds, accuracy, etc. Apparently the T90 Ascente doesn&#8217;t have a “sweet spot,” per se, rather that the whole ball is a sweet spot. That is, wherever you kick it, the ball will react as if you&#8217;ve kicked the sweet spot. Good news for <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DA4PcqS9Nyp8&sref=rss">Quaresma</a>. (Why do sports compilation videos on YouTube always have terrible music?)</p>
<p>Longer range? That&#8217;s pretty obvious, right? The ball is constructed in three layers, and this <i>somehow</i> makes the ball travel two ball lengths longer than previous Nike footballs.</p>
<p>Increased visibility. You&#8217;ll notice the patterns on the ball; it sort of looks like the scanner from <i>Half-Life 2</i>:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/scanner.jpg" alt="scanner" title="scanner" width="200" height="227" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-99969" /></p>
<p>Anyhow, the patterns are such that they create a “flicker” as the ball spins. That&#8217;ll be helpful on those awful, gray winter days in Liverpool. </p>
<p>If you actually had the ball in your hands, you&#8217;d see that its surface is textured to a degree that&#8217;s probably a little different than the last ball you kicked. Nike calls it “micro-textured,” which basically lets air flow around the ball more smoothly, creating less resistance, etc. You know, like the dimples on a golf ball.</p>
<p>The T90 Ascenete is also faster than previous balls, traveling at about 22.19 m/s (72.17 feet/s). Something to do with the three-layer construction.</p>
<p>All this talk of multi-layer construction reminds me of the great Razor Blade Wars of the past decade. “Our razor has three blades.” “Well our razor has four blades.” “Ha! Our blade has <i>five</i> blades!.</p>
<p>And, uh, if you speak Spanish, watch this video. It explains the <i>technological wonder</i> of the ball.</p>
<div align="right" class="center"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iWS8JabOHF8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iWS8JabOHF8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></div>
<p>Nike has its own video, in English, that I can&#8217;t embed. (Though, if I were feeling crazy, I could probably just swipe the Flash file then upload to our CG YouTube account. No thanks.) It&#8217;s <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Finside.nike.com%2Fblogs%2Fnikefootball-en_GB%2F2009%2F07%2F07%2Fin-pursuit-of-accuracy&sref=rss">here</a> if you&#8217;re interested. </p>
<p>About 15 minutes ago I wrote “Goalkeepers will hate it; flashy forwards will love it.” But now I see FC Barcelona&#8217;s goalkeeper Víctor Valdés praising the ball in that Spanish video. Figures.</p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedads.g.doubleclick.net%2F%7Eat%2FUA3byPjDDNrJhweKkEwLhLH0lxI%2F0%2Fda&sref=rss"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/UA3byPjDDNrJhweKkEwLhLH0lxI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedads.g.doubleclick.net%2F%7Eat%2FUA3byPjDDNrJhweKkEwLhLH0lxI%2F1%2Fda&sref=rss"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/UA3byPjDDNrJhweKkEwLhLH0lxI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2Fcrunchgear%3Fa%3DAAVWcJeXChQ%3A8R-GGScMGUk%3AV_sGLiPBpWU&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?i=AAVWcJeXChQ:8R-GGScMGUk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2Fcrunchgear%3Fa%3DAAVWcJeXChQ%3A8R-GGScMGUk%3AF7zBnMyn0Lo&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?i=AAVWcJeXChQ:8R-GGScMGUk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2Fcrunchgear%3Fa%3DAAVWcJeXChQ%3A8R-GGScMGUk%3AyIl2AUoC8zA&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/crunchgear?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a>
</div>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/18804/nike%e2%80%99s-t90-ascente-football-so-damn-advanced-they-might-as-well-throw-google-chrome-os-on-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

