Posts Tagged Initiative

Wi-Fi roaming will make mobile operators connectivity providers

Posted by on Thursday, 6 October, 2011

While mobile operators are increasingly relying on Wi-Fi to augment their cellular networks, it’s still a lesser tool in their toolbox. But in the coming year, Wi-Fi is going to play a more vital role for carriers turning operators from providers of cellular voice and data to purveyors of connectivity.

That’s the prediction of Bob Friday, the CTO of wireless for Cisco, who is helping push this vision along. Cisco is a major driver behind Hotspot 2.0, an initiative that will use 802.11u, WPA2-Enterprise and EAP-based authentication to create easy Wi-Fi roaming for devices looking to move from cellular networks onto Wi-Fi networks or between Wi-Fi networks. Essentially, it will bring the ease of cellular roaming to Wi-Fi, something Stacey has written about before.

“The vision is to bring cellular-like authentication to Wi-Fi. Hotspot is trying to be the SIM card for Wi-Fi. We’re trying to bring connectivity to the general public,” Friday said.

This kind of roaming, Friday said, will make Wi-Fi a much more versatile tool for wireless operators because it will greatly simplify the way people jump onto Wi-Fi networks. He said by automating the authentication process, tying user identity to a SIM card and making it seamless for users, their devices can easily shift over to Wi-Fi networks without having to enter in credentials. And that will help transfer the data traffic burden on to Wi-Fi while giving users a better experience indoors and at crowded venues.

But it could also allow carriers to charge their users for access to Wi-Fi. That’s something we’ve talked of before, and it remains a potential byproduct of easier Wi-Fi roaming. Carriers, as they do with cellular roaming, could charge users when they jump on to other networks and track their usage using their SIM card. Friday said it’s possible that users would pay to roam on international Wi-Fi networks, but he wasn’t sure that would be the case domestically, if carriers signed agreements between each other. But it could be another source of revenue for carriers interested in bolstering their bottom line.

In the larger picture, Wi-Fi will become a much more valuable weapon in their arsenal and along with femto cells and small cells, will make them focus on delivering broader connectivity, regardless of the technology. Through their own Wi-Fi networks and roaming agreements with other Wi-Fi network providers and owners of hotspots, the operators can better construct a comprehensive system that keeps their users connected. Users will not only be able to jump on to Wi-Fi networks seamlessly but they’ll also be able to move between Wi-Fi networks.

The Wi-Fi Alliance and Wireless Broadband Alliance in June announced plans to collaborate on developing Hotspot 2.0 to ease Wi-Fi roaming. Trials are being conducted this year with further testing and a rollout expected to take place in the first half of next year, Friday said.

It’s unclear if all the operators will sign on, which would undercut the usefulness of Hotspot 2.0. Japan’s KDDI is already pursuing its own proprietary solution with a network that utilizes seamless switching between the cell sites and 100,000 Wi-Fi hotspots with a WiMAX overlay. Other companies are also putting together their own tools to help with Wi-Fi roaming. But Friday believes operators will be motivated to wait for Hotspot 2.0 to achieve a more comprehensive roaming system.

“It’s in the interest of the operators (to support Hotspot 2.0). It’s the same drive for cellular authentication that will drive them to Wi-Fi authentication,” Friday said.

This is going be key especially with the explosion of Wi-Fi hotspot use. In-Stat recently estimated that by  2015, wireless hotspots will account for nearly 120 billion connect sessions. And by 2013, there will be one million hotspot locations available. With so many hotspots available, having a comprehensive program to ensure easy roaming will facilitate the kind of sharing that has helped cellular operators. And it will mean more utility for users, who will have fewer restrictions in moving between Wi-Fi networks.

And just like KDDI is already proving, carriers will increasingly operate more heterogeneous networks that utilize a handful of technologies to connect users. It makes sense for the carriers to stay on top of exploding data traffic and it gives users a better experience and potentially more lower prices. The only questions are will the operators wait around for Hotspot 2.0 or pursue their own solution now? And will they charge for all this additional Wi-Fi service?

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • The future of mobile: a segment analysis by GigaOM Pro
  • What Amazon’s new Kindle line means for Apple, Netflix and online media
  • Mobile Q2: Smartphone growth surges; iPad’s rule continues



alt=''
border='0'
/>


GigaOM


Android users only spend time on top apps

Posted by on Thursday, 18 August, 2011

Android users have about 250,000 apps to choose from but most have little use for any of them outside the top 50. That’s according to new data from Nielsen’s Smartphone Analytics, a new initiative that analyzes data from on-device meters.

The interesting news is that the top 10 Android apps account for 43 percent of the time spent on all mobile apps by Android users. And when you look at the top 50 apps, 61 percent of the time spent is on these apps. That means that if you’re an app maker on Android, you’re facing long odds at being used if you’re even in the bottom half of the top 100. And if you’re lost among the rest of the 249,550 apps, good luck getting any usage.

This backs up data that I recently reported from Mobilewalla, an app ratings analytics and discovery firm. Mobilewalla found that the top 30 apps in Android Market had between 11,000 and 20,000 ratings compared to about 6,000 ratings for the top 30 apps in the Apple App Store. But when you looked at the next 210 apps beyond the top 30, Android’s average ratings per app plummeted to just a few hundred per app while Apple’s ratings counts remained between 2,000 and 6,000. That showed that app usage on Android was clustered at the top of the app charts but didn’t extend down to less popular apps.

The growing picture here is that Android has a real issue in making sure that more developers can thrive in the Android Market. If you’re a developer and you can’t afford to pay for marketing or you don’t have some amazing viral hit, it looks like it’s very hard to get your app used and that makes it hard to crack profitability on Android for all but the biggest apps. If you’re not being used that often, you can’t expect to garner that much in advertising or in-app purchases.

This is part of the reason why developers prefer Apple’s App Store, because it’s better place to make money. It’s still hard to get noticed among the 425,000 apps there but iOS users seem to explore more of the apps outside the top charts. That means developers get more in download revenue and more through other monetization tools. And that’s why Apple can boast about cutting a check of .5 billion to developers because it’s opening up broader opportunities for more developers.

Google has done a lot of work to improve the app experience in Android Market but it’s got to do a better job of aiding in discovery. And Android developers need to keep pushing the quality of apps in Android Market so people take note of not just the top apps. With developers increasingly getting their revenue from freemium apps, which now generates 2/3 of the revenue in the top 100 games on iOS, it’s even more important for developers to get their apps used and to have longer term engagement with users. That’s something Google still needs to keep working on with its developers to ensure that the success of Android Market is not only limited to a few top publishers.

Nielsen also found that the average Android users in the U.S. spends 56 minutes a day using the web and apps on their phone. Android users spend 67 percent of their time in apps compared to 33 percent using the web. That appears consistent with recent findings from analytics firm Flurry, which found that minutes spent on mobile apps eclipsed mobile web usage on smartphones for the first time in June. 

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Mobile 2011: Data Consumption Will Explode
  • Connected Consumer Q2: Digital music meets the cloud; e-book growth explodes
  • Mobile Q2: Smartphone growth surges; iPad’s rule continues


alt=''
border='0'
/>


GigaOM — Tech News, Analysis and Trends


Google wants to speed up your site, while resisting the urge to sell you stuff

Posted by on Saturday, 30 July, 2011

Google has plenty of things going for it, but patience has never really been high on the list — not surprising, really, for a company that employs scooters to get around the halls of its offices. The search giant has taken a similar approach to the web, offering up a number of services to help speed things up around the old tubes. Page Speed Service is the latest simply named initiative on that front, which has apparently offered up speed improvements of 25 to 60 percent in its early testing phases. How does this magical quickening work? Google grabs content from your servers, rewrites pages with performance best practices, and sends them out through its own servers. The service has raised a few eyebrows, but Google insists that Page Speed Service is all about improving performance, not collecting information for future advertising opportunities.

Google wants to speed up your site, while resisting the urge to sell you stuff originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:23:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink All Things D  |  sourceGoogle  | Email this | Comments
Engadget


Here’s How Facebook Wants to Keep Its Engineers Happy

Posted by on Sunday, 8 May, 2011

Last week, Facebook formally announced “Hackamonth,” an internal initiative that allows some engineers to leave their team to work on a side project of their choosing. The goal is to prevent burnout among the staff and should result in some cool new products.

In fact, it already has. Over the past year, Facebook tested out Hackamonth with 35 engineers who were encouraged to submit project ideas requiring about a month’s worth of work. Each participating engineer then voted to join the project they found the most interesting. The three most popular projects became the first pilot Hackamonths.

The results were impressive: Facebook’s new Deals feature was actually born out of one of the three pilot Hackamonth projects, Facebook spokesman Slater Tow told me this week. Deals started as a Hackamonth pilot led by Facebook engineer Brian Sa and was initially dubbed “Paid Deals.”

Starting this week, Hackamonths are now available to any Facebook engineer who has worked on the same project for more than a year. At the end of a Hackamonth, engineers can choose to either go back to the old project or stay on the new one. According to the company, Facebook hopes to have around 10 percent of its engineers working on a Hackamonth at any given time.

The Hackamonth idea is an extension of Facebook’s longtime tradition of engineering “hackathons,” overnight events complete with beer, food, and DJs. During hackathons, employees must follow just one rule: They can’t work on anything related to their day jobs.

“For engineers, hackathons are opportunities to dive into any other project they’ve had their eye on. It’s a chance to shake things up for a night,” Tow said. “Hackamonth is a way to perpetuate this hackathon mentality into a full month.”

The parallels to other institutionalized burnout prevention tactics, such as Google’s 20 percent time program, are clear. What’s interesting about Facebook’s Hackamonth is that retention initiatives aren’t usually associated with venture-backed companies; the potential for a cash-out from a sale or IPO is usually enough to keep employees around. At nearly seven years after its first round of venture capital investment, Facebook is at an interesting spot that stretches the definition of startup (for reference, Google held its IPO five years after its first venture funding round). The Hackamonth initiative further solidifies Facebook’s status as a more mature company — albeit in a state of protracted adolescence.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):

  • Defining Hadoop: the Players, Technologies and Challenges of 2011
  • The Near-Term Evolution of Social Commerce
  • A 2011 NewNet Forecast



alt='The cloud-optimized networks of tomorrow run on Brocade Ethernet fabrics today. Assess Your Cloud Readiness. Download Forrester Study »'
border='0' width='300' height='250'
/>


GigaOM


Google Holds Out Against ‘Do Not Track’ Flag

Posted by on Saturday, 16 April, 2011

Google is the only major holdout in the “Do Not Track” flag initiative that Microsoft, Apple and Firefox are incorporating into their browsers. Google says the flag is too unclear — but it could also hurt its bottom line.



Wired Top Stories


Singel-Minded: With Facebook Comments, Another ‘Good News, Bad News’ Proposition

Posted by on Sunday, 6 March, 2011

Facebook unleashed a new commenting system this week that promises to help online publications clean up their commenting cesspools while simultaneously extending Facebook’s tentacles further into the web outside its walls. Unfortunately for those with visions of a non-Facebook dominated web, this initiative has the potential to dramatically expand the ginormous social network’s already imperial reach.



Wired Top Stories