<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dv-depot.com &#187; Iterations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dv-depot.com/tag/iterations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dv-depot.com</link>
	<description>The best in Gadgets &#38; Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:14:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The New Windows 8 First Touch: This Is Windows? [Video]</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/86809/the-new-windows-8-first-touch-this-is-windows-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/86809/the-new-windows-8-first-touch-this-is-windows-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Tech Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eyeballs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/86809/the-new-windows-8-first-touch-this-is-windows-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#8217;t sound like particularly shimmery compliment, but the best thing that I can say about Microsoft&#8217;s Metro UI is that after over a year of using it in various iterations, it still feels new. Not like never-breached-my-eyeballs-before new, but new as in the promise of something better, something from the future. But it&#8217;s here, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 190px; padding: 1px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">windows8</span></div>
<div>
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="190" title="Click here to read The New Windows 8 First Touch: &lt;em&gt;This&lt;/em&gt; Is Windows?" alt="Click here to read The New Windows 8 First Touch: &lt;em&gt;This&lt;/em&gt; Is Windows?" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2012/01/small_4c2b49c0722714ec84646bb0861fbd36.jpg"/><br />
						<span class="play_icon"></span>					</div>
<p>				 <!-- videoId: explore/gizmodo/videos/1364 --><!-- /videoId: explore/gizmodo/videos/1364 --> It doesn&#8217;t sound like particularly shimmery compliment, but the best thing that I can say about Microsoft&#8217;s Metro UI is that after over a year of using it in various iterations, it still feels new. Not like never-breached-my-eyeballs-before new, but <em>new</em> as in the promise of something better, something from the future. But it&#8217;s here, and I&#8217;m touching it with Windows 8. And it&#8217;s going to redefine how like a bajillion people are going to use their computer over the next couple of years.				More&nbsp;&raquo;<br />
				<br style="clear: both;" /><br />
			<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/><br />
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/><br />
<img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=eb3b8e02795033dd230de2b9021ecea2&#038;p=1"/><br />
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://segment-pixel.invitemedia.com/pixel?code=TechCons&#038;partnerID=167&#038;key=segment"/><img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://insight.adsrvr.org/track/evnt/?ct=0:dupdmqp&#038;adv=wouzn4v&#038;fmt=3"/>
<div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=k1iY8fOP-5w:Zp_sb3JB0DA:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=k1iY8fOP-5w:Zp_sb3JB0DA:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/k1iY8fOP-5w" height="1" width="1"/><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.gawker.com%2F%7Er%2Fgizmodo%2Ffull%2F%7E3%2Fk1iY8fOP-5w%2Fthe-new-windows-8-first-touch-this-is-windows&sref=rss">Gizmodo</a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/86809/the-new-windows-8-first-touch-this-is-windows-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orange coaxes customers to buy smartphones with Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/86055/orange-coaxes-customers-to-buy-smartphones-with-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/86055/orange-coaxes-customers-to-buy-smartphones-with-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Tech Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthdays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calendar Client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coaxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consistent Basis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Customer Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Remy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Albums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savvy Customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tcl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/86055/orange-coaxes-customers-to-buy-smartphones-with-facebook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orange is launching three new low-priced Android smartphones for people who live for Facebook in an attempt to lure more of its global customer base into the smartphone fold. Roughly 50 percent of Orange’s European and African customers have smartphones today, but the operator thinks it can boost that number by another 10 or 15 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 813F - Orange" src="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/alcatel-one-touch-813f-orange.jpg?w=213&#038;h=300" alt="" width="213" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-439830 alignleft" />Orange is launching three new low-priced Android smartphones for people who live for Facebook in an attempt to lure more of its global customer base into the smartphone fold. Roughly 50 percent of Orange’s European and African customers have smartphones today, but the operator thinks it can boost that number by another 10 or 15 percent if it provides not only inexpensive devices and data plans but also cuts through the application clutter of the typical Android smartphone, focusing on social media applications that its less technically savvy customers are already well familiar with.</p>
<p>“There are over 400,000 apps in Android market, which is mind boggling,” Orange Group Devices vice president Patrick Remy said in an interview today. “We believe that there is a certain point where that level of choice will become a bit too much for our customers, that they’ll become a bit lost with that level of complexity.”</p>
<p>Orange polled its customers over what mobile data features would coax them into buying a smartphone. “One name kept coming back on a consistent basis,” Remy said. Several iterations of the Facebook phone have emerged from companies like HTC and INQ, but Orange opted to work with directly with Facebook and TCL, which makes handsets via license under the Alcatel Brand, to create its own line of devices. Remy said Orange wanted to make the phone Facebook-centric, but not Facebook exclusive. By allowing customers to utilize the fill capabilities of the Android platform, they would then gravitate to other applications and platforms.</p>
<p>But Orange is doing plenty to keep Facebookers happy. The phones are designed to make the device almost an extension of a customers Facebook account. Facebook birthdays are automatically loaded into the Calendar client, contacts are synched with Facebook friends and photos automatically populate the phones’ photo albums. A physical Facebook key allows performs a variety of functions depending on what the customer is doing on screen. If the customer is surfing the Web, a press of the Facebook button automatically loads a link. If pressed in the camera mode, the photo is posted as an update, and so forth. Many of the features are similar to those designed into the HTC Status used on AT&amp;T’s network.</p>
<p>It’s first device is the Orange Vancouver (Orange has a thing for phones with city monikers like Boston and Monte Carlo), which will launch in Romania with a price tag of 100 Euros (USD 5) with 9 Euro monthly plan, including 50 minutes of voice, 200 SMS and 60 MB of 3G data. Facebook usage is excepted from the data limited, leaving social networks to update their statuses, send messages and upload and download photos to their hearts’ content. Orange plans to launch two other Android Facebook phones at even lower price points (though without 3G) will begin offering them in all of its markets from continental Europe to sub-Saharan Africa through 2012.</p>
<p>Unlimited Facebook access won’t be available in every market. So far, Orange is only planning to make that a basic feature in Tunisia and Romania, though in other countries customers can subscribe to special unlimited social networking plans. The idea is to make customers feel comfortable with data by not metering their data usage on their favorite application, Remy said.</p>
<p>It sounds simple enough, but customers might find themselves confused as to what exactly counts as Facebook and what doesn’t it. A link update, for instance, is no longer under the Facebook umbrella once a customer clicks on it and exits to the browser. A YouTube video embedded in friend stream could be particular problematic. Opening the video means opening YouTube’s Android app or website, and nothing can drain a 60 MB plan faster than streaming video.</p>
<p><strong>Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:</strong><br />Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.</p>
<ul>
<li>The mobile backhaul market, 2011-2012: more innovation, greater&nbsp;competition</li>
<li>What Amazon&#8217;s new Kindle line means for Apple, Netflix and online&nbsp;media</li>
<li>The future of mobile: a segment analysis by GigaOM&nbsp;Pro</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=gigaom.com&amp;blog=14960843&amp;post=439824&amp;subd=gigaom2&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><br />
<hr />
<p>		<img src='http://ads.gigaom.com/show/rss/'<br />
			alt=''<br />
			border='0'<br />
		/></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?i=GY7cRB1Xv0I:6t7QxnBkr84:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?i=GY7cRB1Xv0I:6t7QxnBkr84:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?i=GY7cRB1Xv0I:6t7QxnBkr84:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"/>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OmMalik/~4/GY7cRB1Xv0I" height="1" width="1"/><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FOmMalik%2F%7E3%2FGY7cRB1Xv0I%2F&sref=rss">GigaOM</a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/86055/orange-coaxes-customers-to-buy-smartphones-with-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arduino delivers Android and Ethernet toys for all the good little DIYers</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/84369/arduino-delivers-android-and-ethernet-toys-for-all-the-good-little-diyers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/84369/arduino-delivers-android-and-ethernet-toys-for-all-the-good-little-diyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Tech Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arduino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas In July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diy Scene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIYers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kit Euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[little]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microcontroller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synonym]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usb Serial Adapter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/84369/arduino-delivers-android-and-ethernet-toys-for-all-the-good-little-diyers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s like Christmas in July Arduino fans. The Italian open-source hardware platform just scored a number of new add-ons and a pair of fresh iterations that are sure to keep you tinkering and hacking for some time. First up is the Arduino Ethernet &#8212; which, as you may have guessed &#8212; sports an onboard Ethernet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">
	<img alt="Adruino Ethernet" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/07/5926982332d81f988b23-1310732559.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px;" /></div>
<p>It&#8217;s like Christmas in July Arduino fans. The Italian open-source hardware platform just scored a number of new add-ons and a pair of fresh iterations that are sure to keep you tinkering and hacking for some time. First up is the Arduino Ethernet &#8212; which, as you may have guessed &#8212; sports an onboard Ethernet jack. You&#8217;ll probably want to pick up a USB Serial Adapter to program the ATmega328 chip but, once you&#8217;ve loaded your code, it can be hooked up to the web without the need for a Ethernet shield &#8212; and an optional PoE (Power over Ethernet) module means you&#8217;ll only need one cable for all you net-connected projects. The DIY scene&#8217;s favorite microcontroller was also blessed with the new Arduino ADK board, a take on Google&#8217;s accessory development platform. And, if you&#8217;re not sure where to get started, you can pick up an entire kit for &euro;249 (about 2) that includes not only the ADK board, but a huge pile of sensors and components, and the Mega Sensor Shield to arrange them on. The ADK alone will run you &euro;59 (), while the Arduino Ethernet costs &euro;39.90 () with an additional &euro;14.90 () for the PoE module. Can you say a synonym for awesome?
<p>Continue reading <em>Arduino delivers Android and Ethernet toys for all the good little DIYers</em></p>
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;">Arduino delivers Android and Ethernet toys for all the good little DIYers originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:59:00 EDT.  Please see our terms for use of feeds.</p>
<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6>
<p>Permalink&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img class="img_label" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif" alt="source"/><span class="caption">Arduino Blog<!--//--></span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.engadget.com%2F2011%2F07%2F15%2Farduino-delivers-android-and-ethernet-toys-for-all-the-good-litt%2F&sref=rss">Engadget</a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/84369/arduino-delivers-android-and-ethernet-toys-for-all-the-good-little-diyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bluetooth to Battle for Personal Area Network Crown</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/81094/bluetooth-to-battle-for-personal-area-network-crown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/81094/bluetooth-to-battle-for-personal-area-network-crown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Tech Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analog Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynastream Innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exercise Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glucose Monitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Foley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedometers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Area Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Interest Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/81094/bluetooth-to-battle-for-personal-area-network-crown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our phones are about to undergo another revolution. They have already shifted from devices designed for phone calls to computers that connect us to the web, but in the years ahead, they will also become the means people capture physical and analog data about the world around them and transfer it to the web. Today [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="pedometer-300x225" src="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/pedometer-300x225.jpg?w=186&#038;h=140" alt="" width="186" height="140" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-290773" /> Our phones are about to undergo another revolution. They have already shifted from devices designed for phone calls to computers that connect us to the web, but in the years ahead, they will also become the means people capture physical and analog data about the world around them and transfer it to the web. Today people are using smartphones as heart monitors, calorie trackers and pedometers, and as more and more people buy smartphones, the number of people trying these apps out will rise.</p>
<p>But to communicate with sensors on your body, in your home, in a medical setting or even with an exercise machine, your handset needs a radio (actually both devices need a radio) and that radio should be able to transmit data over short distances using a minimum of power. Several companies and technologies are vying to provide that radio technology as I detail an article at GigaOM Pro (subscription required).  While I provide more information in the GigaOM Pro article, below are a few of the players and their respective PAN technologies hoping to gain a toehold in the handset.</p>
<p><strong>Bluetooth Special Interest Group:</strong> Bluetooth, which is a specification for sending data over short distances is the dominant means of connecting headsets to phones. Now it&#8217;s also used in a variety of mobile-health applications such as blood pressure and glucose monitors.</p>
<p>Bluetooth has the advantage of already being integrated into most handsets, but its critics claim that it is a battery suck. However, a low-power version of Bluetooth (Bluetooth Low Energy) is on its way and will solve some of the battery life issues, says Mike Foley, the head of the Bluetooth SIG, in an interview. However, most devices today don&#8217;t have the Bluetooth Low Energy chips (although they contain other iterations of Bluetooth radios), so it will take a few years until those radios are in most consumers handsets.</p>
<p><strong>Dynastream Innovations (ANT):</strong> Dynastream, a subsidiary of personal-navigation powerhouse Garmin, has created a low-power, short-range wireless technology called ANT. The benefit of ANT is that it consumes much less power than Bluetooth or ZigBee chips, but it&#8217;s not yet widely available in handsets. However, at this year&#8217;s CES, ANT had some wins with TI, introducing a combined Bluetooth and ANT chip, and Sony Ericsson (admittedly not a big player in the smartphone industry), who said it would deploy ANT in its handsets. Other fitness-focused devices such as the Fitbit (see disclosure) also use ANT.</p>
<p><strong>Apple</strong><strong>:</strong> Apple modified Bluetooth to make it more power-efficient to create its PAN technology, which powers the radio inside the Nike pedometer. It could also end up in other devices designed to attach to Apple gear such as iPads, iPhones and iPods. Apple notes that its proprietary radio technology operates in the 2.4 Ghz band, as does Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, ANT and other technologies. In addition to its program with Nike, Apple also has fitness machine makers embedding compatible radios and sensors inside their machines to communicate with iPhones and iPods.</p>
<p>However, the future for personal area networks won&#8217;t belong to one standard or one company. Most likely a variety of radios will make it on smartphones. For more on the coming battle for personal area network supremacy and the technologies and players involved, read the full analysis at GigaOM Pro.</p>
<p><em>Image Source: flickr user Faizuddin</em></p>
<p><strong>Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Supercomputers and the Search for the Exascale Grail</li>
<li> Pushing Processors Past Moore&#8217;s Law</li>
<li> Thing Converged Infrastructure Means Lock In? Think Again.</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=gigaom.com&amp;blog=14960843&amp;post=290712&amp;subd=gigaom2&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />
<div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?i=T1LdvivZO_c:uMc0NNzkYuQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?i=T1LdvivZO_c:uMc0NNzkYuQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OmMalik?i=T1LdvivZO_c:uMc0NNzkYuQ:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"/>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OmMalik/~4/T1LdvivZO_c" height="1" width="1"/><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FOmMalik%2F%7E3%2FT1LdvivZO_c%2F&sref=rss">GigaOMTech</a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/81094/bluetooth-to-battle-for-personal-area-network-crown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorists Warned About Sneaky Crow Wiper Attacks.</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/73445/motorists-warned-about-sneaky-crow-wiper-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/73445/motorists-warned-about-sneaky-crow-wiper-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>techgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aluminium Sulphate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appauled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apprehension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broad Daylight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culprits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guilty Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hundred Thousand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mineral Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rare Mineral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society For The Protection Of Birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicone Wiper Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Drivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Two Million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unnamed Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Scenario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiper Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Bird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/73445/motorists-warned-about-sneaky-crow-wiper-attacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sunday drivers wipers are at heightened danger from aerial abuse following a rash of foolhardy avian attacks in broad daylight. It seems some types of bird have attempted to consume wipers in order to obtain the rare mineral nutrition which can be found in some varieties of rubber. One outstanding incident hit the head lines [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunday drivers wipers are at heightened danger from aerial abuse following a rash of foolhardy avian attacks in broad daylight. It seems some types of bird have attempted to consume wipers in order to obtain the rare mineral nutrition which can be found in some varieties of rubber. One outstanding incident hit the head lines in the BBC when a group of angry inquisitive birds at a park in ride situated in York deprived the cars of their valuable rubber wipers. Some of the owners claimed to have lost as many as eight sets of <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xopc.co.uk%2Fsilicone_wiper_blades.htm&sref=rss" target='_blank'>replacement wiper blades</a> over the period and were agast to discover the culprits were a flock of starving avians. According to some unnamed sources in the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds the birds are drawn to the wipers by the mineral parts, which can be garnered there by an active young bird. In order to fight this recent annoying trend motorists have been advised to perform some common steps like coating their wiper blades in aluminium sulphate to antcipate any would be vandals. </p>
<p>One person was quoted as being appauled after revealing who the guilty party actually were, he went on to say how it took numerous weeks before he found who the true culprits were. After driving home one evening he soon found to his apprehension the rubber was stripping from his wipers, after buying several sets of replacement wiper blades he went back to his car one evening and found a trail of rubber. One way this whole scenario could have been avoided was purchasing some silicone replacement wiper blades, silicone is not known to be discovered in the diets of many animals and also represent much better value for money over the long term. Your basic rubber wiper blades will cost in the region of five to twenty pounds but only be good for approximately one hundred thousand to two hundred thousand cycles. Your basic silicone <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xopc.co.uk%2Fsilicone_wiper_blades.htm&sref=rss" target='_blank'>wiper blades</a> however will be reasonable for as many as two million individual iterations and keep on going for much longer. </p>
<p>But that&rsquo;s not all; silicone wipers have many great properties which aid the intrepid car owner, in cold weather aspects your basic rubber wipers will stick to the wind screen. Not so with silicone, they have a slick slippery property to them which stops them from sticking to the glass in the cold. Another problem with rubber wipers besides being on the menu for crows is that they are prone to become fixed rigid and inflexible in below zero driving conditions. Silicone wipers do not have this problem, they are resistant to all kinds of temperature extremes, both hot and cold; they will abide their miraculous abilities. In the heat basic rubber wipers become too soft and physically stick to the wind screen, silicone <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xopc.co.uk%2Fsilicone_wiper_blades.htm&sref=rss" target='_blank'>wipers</a> do not melt; this is why you often find silicone used in cooking equipment and even on space shuttles. Another great property is that they are resistant to erosion by water and pollution such as ozone and sulphuric acid, this is why your common rubber wipers perform so poorly in comparison.</p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/73445/motorists-warned-about-sneaky-crow-wiper-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Is The Ultimate Period To Replace Your Wiper Blade This Year?</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/73194/when-is-the-ultimate-period-to-replace-your-wiper-blade-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/73194/when-is-the-ultimate-period-to-replace-your-wiper-blade-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 11:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>techgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detrimental Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Span]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Rubber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rubber Replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicone Wiper Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Seasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultraviolet Rays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windscreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiper Blade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiper Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wipers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/73194/when-is-the-ultimate-period-to-replace-your-wiper-blade-this-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the common wipers it is average to divine around one million different iterations across your windscreen, this equates to around 700 miles in sum, so it should come as no surprise that the average rubber wipers sustains heavy breakage during its life time. Even the highest quality rubber replacement wiper blades is therefore accessible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the common wipers it is average to divine around one million different iterations across your windscreen, this equates to around 700 miles in sum, so it should come as no surprise that the average rubber wipers sustains heavy breakage during its life time. Even the highest quality rubber <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xopc.co.uk%2Fsilicone_wiper_blades.htm&sref=rss" target='_blank'>replacement wiper blades</a> is therefore accessible to attrition and tear, not only mechanically but also chemically, as rubber is affected with pollution such as ozone to author even more damage.</p>
<p> Even the basic constitutents such as water and high and low temperatures can cause damage to a rubber replacement wiper blades quite quickly. Not to mention sunlight or ultraviolet rays which errode the rubber, all of these things will have a huge detrimental effect on the life span of a wipers. Things to analyze when buying replacement wiper blades include your location and the climate you have at that location. A person who lives in a climate with different winter and summer seasons should consider changing their <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xopc.co.uk%2Fsilicone_wiper_blades.htm&sref=rss" target='_blank'>wiper blades</a> at least once a year, further en route to the equator the temperature goes up and the need to replace your wiper blades is less. For this reason it is vital to consider the type of apparatus used to manufacture your replace wipers, rubber is no good, and it degrades rather quickly. A better alternative is silicone, silicone wiper blades take value of the many great qualities associated with the essence. Many people simply do not purchase replacement wiper blades because they are undecided as to what wiper blades are appropriate for their car. Well let me tell you that any wipers is agreeable with any car, it is a matter of choosing how much you want to spend. Silicone wiper blades although a little bit more expensive actually last many times longer than even the best premium quality rubber wiper blades so they therefore brandish excellent value for money. It is considerably more amenable to change your wiper blades today than it was only a few years ago, there is no need to buy any tools or special attachments you simply slide the wipers out from the wiper arm manually with minimal effort and replace it with you new wipers, easy. </p>
<p>Despite this it is still apparent that the bulk of people are still not replacing their wiper blades often enough, in fact this has become such a puzzle that one company has even began producing a wipers with an indicator telling the user how much longer the wipers should be worn. This wear indicator is like those located on batteries or even tooth brushes and acts as a basic reminder to the user to replace the wipers when it gets too low. The indicator alters from one colour to another to indicate the class of wear, first it starts as a yellow and transitions to a black as time goes on. This author certainly commends this company for taking steps to confirm the safety of the public and raising awareness to the issue of wipers safety, hopefully this product will encourage more drivers to check their wiper blades more often.</p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/73194/when-is-the-ultimate-period-to-replace-your-wiper-blade-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Handy Chart Identifies Your Phone&#8217;s Version of Android [Android]</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/70975/handy-chart-identifies-your-phones-version-of-android-android/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/70975/handy-chart-identifies-your-phones-version-of-android-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 19:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[modo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Jerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cupcake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firmware Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Froyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handy Chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identifies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obviated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[version]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dv-depot.com/70975/handy-chart-identifies-your-phones-version-of-android-android/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; padding-right: 10px;">
										<!--  div style="background-color: #B3B3B3; width: 160px; padding: 1px;"><span style="color: white;" class="hash">#</span><span style="color: white;">android</span></div>
<div>
						<img style="border-color: #B3B3B3; border-width: 0 1px 1px; border-style: none solid solid;" height="120" width="160" title="Click here to read Handy Chart Identifies Your Phone's Version of Android" alt="Click here to read Handy Chart Identifies Your Phone's Version of Android" src="http://cache-02.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/05/160x120_androidsmarts.jpg"/>
											</div>
<p>				Cupcake? Froyo? Ben&#038;Jerry&#8217;s? I can&#8217;t be the only one who&#8217;s unable to remember the various iterations of Android running on various handsets. This chart will clear things up&#8230;for a few weeks before its obviated by new firmware updates. [Android Tapp]				More&nbsp;&raquo;<br />
				<br style="clear: both;" /><br />
			<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/><br />
<br clear="both" style="clear: both;"/><br />
<img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://ads.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=aacd8de2aacc8c5681fb70cb3c4135a4&#038;p=1"/><br />
<img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://a.triggit.com/px?u=pheedo&#038;rtv=TechCons&#038;rtv=p28252&#038;rtv=f5726"/><img alt="" height="0" width="0" border="0" style="display:none" src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-8bUhLiluj0fAw.gif?labels=pub.28252.rss.TechCons.5726,cat.TechCons.rss"/>
<div class="feedflare">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=39DqNjCrq4E:v04NQYFEztg:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"/> <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/gizmodo/full?i=39DqNjCrq4E:v04NQYFEztg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/39DqNjCrq4E" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.gawker.com%2F%7Er%2Fgizmodo%2Ffull%2F%7E3%2F39DqNjCrq4E%2Fhandy-chart-identifies-your-phones-version-of-android&sref=rss">Gizmodo</a></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/70975/handy-chart-identifies-your-phones-version-of-android-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NewKinetix Rē Universal Remote IR Dongle For The iPhone Now Available</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/50232/newkinetix-re-universal-remote-ir-dongle-for-the-iphone-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/50232/newkinetix-re-universal-remote-ir-dongle-for-the-iphone-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>othertech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohgiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brainer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dongle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favorite Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ir Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Room Basis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Touch Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Touchscreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Remote Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal remotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohgizmo.com/?p=36140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
By Andrew Liszewski
Many years ago Casio had a line of watches that doubled as fairly capable universal remotes, but oddly enough it&#8217;s taken 3 iterations for the iPhone, a device considerably more capable, to gain such functionality. On one hand the Rē from NewKinetix is a little cumbersome since the NK100 IR dongle attaches to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ohgizmo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/newkinetix_re.jpg" alt="NewKinetix Rē Universal Remote IR Dongle (Images courtesy NewKinetix)" title="newkinetix_re" width="500" height="321" class="aligntop" /><br />
By Andrew Liszewski</p>
<p>Many years ago Casio had a line of watches that doubled as fairly capable universal remotes, but oddly enough it&#8217;s taken 3 iterations for the iPhone, a device considerably more capable, to gain such functionality. On one hand the Rē from NewKinetix is a little cumbersome since the NK100 IR dongle attaches to the bottom of your iPhone or iPod Touch, meaning you have to use it upside down, but on the other hand the touch-screen display means the remote can be easily configured any way you want it.</p>
<p>Everything is powered by the Rē Universal Remote Control App which is of course available as a free download from the iTunes App Store, and even though it comes with an extensive and updateable IR database for almost every remote on the planet, it&#8217;s also able to learn commands from that obscure device you picked up the last time you were wandering through the Akihabara district. And since memory isn&#8217;t an issue, you&#8217;re also able to program an unlimited number of macros or favorite channel lists, even on a room to room basis. With a price tag of <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newkinetix.com&sref=rss">$69.95</a> there are still cheaper universal remotes on the market, even with learning capabilities, but if a large touchscreen is on your feature list this is a no-brainer if you&#8217;ve already got an iPhone or iPod Touch.</p>
<p>[ <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newkinetix.com&sref=rss">NewKinetix Rē Universal Remote IR Dongle</a> ]</p>
<p><a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedads.g.doubleclick.net%2F%7Ea%2FviOVjTOXzkz6hqbPCaZBN8jCpnk%2F0%2Fda&sref=rss"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/viOVjTOXzkz6hqbPCaZBN8jCpnk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedads.g.doubleclick.net%2F%7Ea%2FviOVjTOXzkz6hqbPCaZBN8jCpnk%2F1%2Fda&sref=rss"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/viOVjTOXzkz6hqbPCaZBN8jCpnk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DCg3eyTO3wOE%3ASv8j3CsIgbw%3AI2FUP0JpNAM&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?i=Cg3eyTO3wOE:Sv8j3CsIgbw:I2FUP0JpNAM" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DCg3eyTO3wOE%3ASv8j3CsIgbw%3AQXVau8BzmBE&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?d=QXVau8BzmBE" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DCg3eyTO3wOE%3ASv8j3CsIgbw%3AyIl2AUoC8zA&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DCg3eyTO3wOE%3ASv8j3CsIgbw%3AdnMXMwOfBR0&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DCg3eyTO3wOE%3ASv8j3CsIgbw%3AaKCwKftKxY0&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?i=Cg3eyTO3wOE:Sv8j3CsIgbw:aKCwKftKxY0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DCg3eyTO3wOE%3ASv8j3CsIgbw%3A7Q72WNTAKBA&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Eff%2FOhgizmo%3Fa%3DCg3eyTO3wOE%3ASv8j3CsIgbw%3AD7DqB2pKExk&sref=rss"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/Ohgizmo?i=Cg3eyTO3wOE:Sv8j3CsIgbw:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ohgizmo/~4/Cg3eyTO3wOE" height="1" width="1"/></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/50232/newkinetix-re-universal-remote-ir-dongle-for-the-iphone-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Apps, More Problems: How the iPad Will Change the App Store</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/44464/more-apps-more-problems-how-the-ipad-will-change-the-app-store/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/44464/more-apps-more-problems-how-the-ipad-will-change-the-app-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>othertech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[modo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3gs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dual Mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature Set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incompatible Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipod Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kick In The Ass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudimentary Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonic The Hedgehog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storefront]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subtle Differences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Gizmodo-5459834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/topp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_topp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It doesn't really matter what you think of the iPad itself, because <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5457757/apple-ipad-first-hands-on">love</a> it or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5458382/8-things-that-suck-about-the-ipad?skyline=true&#38;s=i">loathe</a> it, it will irreversibly change the landscape of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appstore/">App Store</a>. Here's how.</p>
<h2>Apple Will Finally Have to Fix Fragmentation</h2>
<p>Fragmentation in the App Store is a problem already. Even across devices with the same screen size, same core feature set and same product name, you find subtle differences in capability. A first-gen iPhone doesn't have a compass, so it can't run augmented reality apps. A second-gen iPod Touch can support mic input, while my first-gen model&#8212;purchased just a few months before&#8212;can't. An iPhone 3GS will run a 3D game like <em>N.O.V.A.</em> beautifully, while a regular old 3G struggles to keep a viewable framerate playing <em>Sonic the Hedgehog</em>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/thumb160x_screencap_2010-01-29_at_3.46.13_pm.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Part of the current problem is the lack of division between products in the App Store. Developers generally say what kind of device is supported in obvious cases&#8212;a compass-based app will most of the time be listed as 3GS-only&#8212;but there's almost no enforcement by Apple, meaning that it's easy to download an app that you can't really use. It's getting to the point that there needs to be separate sections for each device, or some kind of rudimentary search or sort parameter for filtering out incompatible software.</p>
<p>We've needed a fix for fragmentation for a while, and hopefully the iPad, being such an obviously distinct device, will give Apple the kick in the ass they need to implement one. The iPad may run all iPhone apps, but the iPhone will not necessarily run all <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipadapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipadapps/">iPad apps</a>, so assuming downloads aren't required to be packaged together as dual-mode iPad/iPhone apps, there will <em>have</em> to be a way to prevent purchasers from accidentally purchasing something they can't use at all on their iPhone. An improved, properly segmented App Store storefront or download system is inevitable; we'll just have to wait and see what it looks like.</p>
<h2>Data Will Be Freed</h2>
<p>In some iterations, the iPad is a 3G-capable device, and in all, it has a microphone. What it never has is built-in voice capabilities&#8212;that is, unless you download them. According to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5458498/apple-now-allowing-voip-over-3g-could-ipad-calls-be-next">early reports</a>, the new iPad and iPhone SDK has lifted the restriction on voice calls over 3G data (VoIPo3G?). Opening up voice over data services for the iPad could have a larger effect on iPhone apps than on iPad apps, since, you know, they're <em>for phones</em>.<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/thumb160x_skypee.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />AT&#38;T isn't the first wireless company to allow voice over 3G data, and the iPhone is far from the first phone to support it, but for both to now be onboard with a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5459260/fring-iphone-app-allows-skype-calls-over-3g">technology</a> that threatens a core feature of carriers' business plans is a very, very good sign.<br /></p>
<h2>In-App Purchasing Will Finally Take Off</h2>
<p>The iPad will ship with a book store, but what about all those fancy magazines? (Or to adopt their parlance, "WHITHER THE PERIODICAL?") If print publications were placing their future success in Apple's hands, Apple's just handed it right back. Unlike books, which will be sold directly through an iTunes-style storefront and viewed through a common interface, magazines and newspapers will be in charge of selling their own apps, with their own interfaces, and their own business models. But this could turn out to be a good thing.<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_500x_nytimes2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br />
Imagine an icon on your iPad. When you tap it, it'll open up your favorite magazine, in full color, with magazine-style formatting and interactive content. The app itself is free, but the content is not&#8212;new issues come either individually, at newsstand-ish prices, or through a subscription. They will compete with one another to provide the best e-magazine experience. Unique, miniature storefronts, selling content for anything from a single publication to an entire publishing empire: <em>this</em> is the kind of thing the App Store's in-app purchase system was made for.</p>
<p>What's funny about this is that in-app purchases are still App Store transactions, carried out through the same payment system and with a portion of revenues set aside for Apple. Nothing will change except the packaging, but that alone will be enough to fundamentally change the App Store economy, and how we pay for print content. (Increased dependence on in-app purchases could help stem the tide of piracy as well, but that's another discussion entirely. Soon!)</p>
<p><em>Note: Apple may be faced with some resistance in this model, though, since magazine publishers would much rather handle billing themselves, if just for the valuable data they could glean about their subscribers.</em></p>
<h2>"Apps" Will Grow Into "Applications"</h2>
<p>Apps are small, they're simple, they've got a short title. They're like <em>applications</em>, but nuggetized. And that's fine! We call software on phones by a different name than we call software on PCs, because something about the products feels different. The iPad could bridge that gap.<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iwork.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br />
The SDK has been out for less than two days, so nobody has had time to really delve into the app potential of the iPad. Except, of course, Apple. Steve Jobs spent what probably seemed like too long on iWork for the iPad, a set of <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5458327/iwork-2010-apple-brings-multitouch-cloud+based-office-to-ipad">$10-a-pop apps</a> that Apple fully redesigned for the iPad's touch interface which are an order of magnitude more complex than anything on the iPhone right now. (Our friend John Mahoney at <a href="http://www.popsci.com/gadgets/article/2010-01/ipads-unexpected-hidden-peak-future-computing">PopSci</a> goes so far as to say these are a sneak preview of Apple's entire future software philosophy. He could be right.)</p>
<p>Of course, these are Apple apps, so you'd expect them to be executed well, and to use Apple's device to its maximum potential. But with more screen real estate, more power, serious text entry abilities and a more mature SDK at their disposal, the developers are going to give us apps of an entirely new caliber, not just a new size.</p>
<h2>Apple Will Rule With an Iron Fist, Or Learn to <em>Let Things Go</em></h2>
<p>With <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5458325/apple-ipad-ebook-app-is-called-ibooks">iBooks</a>, Apple is setting itself up for an awkward situation. Apple has strict (if sometimes inscrutable) rules about what types of apps are permitted, mostly concerning appropriateness of content and the safety and stability of the app's code. The prohibition that always rubbed developers and customers the wrong way, though, is the ban on apps that duplicate the functionality of Apple's apps, like email clients, new browsers, and by extension, alternative music stores and app stores. These are now joined by iBooks, which is unique in that its actually <em>invading</em> territory inhabited by preexisting apps, like Amazon's Kindle app and indie favorites like Stanza. So what does Apple do? Do they purge Kindle and co. from the App Store, or mark ereader apps as incompatible with the iPad? The Kindle app is to iBooks what an Amazon MP3 store app would be to iTunes, all the way down to the competing file formats and DRM systems (iBooks renders a proprietary type of ePub file, while the Kindle sells books in a proprietary AZW format), so even if this would be a terribly dickish thing to do, it's <em>possible</em>.<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_ebooks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br />
The more likely path is a continuation of the gradual erosion of Apple's tight grip on the App Store. Along with explicit, proactive feature additions like the ones we saw in OS 3.0, Apple's been letting more and more types of apps slide through the approval process. The Rhapsody app may not provide a plain music download service like iTunes, but it is music that you pay for, in an app that doesn't come from Apple. you may not be able to download a browser with an entirely new rendering engine, but now you <em>can</em> download a cornucopia of alternative browsers that render through WebKit. Some apps can stream video over 3G now; others can broadcast voice communication over AT&#38;T's data network. It's too early to presume, but if iBooks doesn't murder its competition, Apple could be charting a course toward a more open App Store, not a more tightly controlled one.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipad">The iPad on Giz</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Ftopp.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_topp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It doesn&#8217;t really matter what you think of the iPad itself, because <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5457757%2Fapple-ipad-first-hands-on&sref=rss">love</a> it or <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5458382%2F8-things-that-suck-about-the-ipad%3Fskyline%3Dtrue%26%23038%3Bs%3Di&sref=rss">loathe</a> it, it will irreversibly change the landscape of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appstore" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2Ftag%2Fappstore%2F&sref=rss">App Store</a>. Here&#8217;s how.</p>
<h2>Apple Will Finally Have to Fix Fragmentation</h2>
<p>Fragmentation in the App Store is a problem already. Even across devices with the same screen size, same core feature set and same product name, you find subtle differences in capability. A first-gen iPhone doesn&#8217;t have a compass, so it can&#8217;t run augmented reality apps. A second-gen iPod Touch can support mic input, while my first-gen model&mdash;purchased just a few months before&mdash;can&#8217;t. An iPhone 3GS will run a 3D game like <em>N.O.V.A.</em> beautifully, while a regular old 3G struggles to keep a viewable framerate playing <em>Sonic the Hedgehog</em>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/thumb160x_screencap_2010-01-29_at_3.46.13_pm.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Part of the current problem is the lack of division between products in the App Store. Developers generally say what kind of device is supported in obvious cases&mdash;a compass-based app will most of the time be listed as 3GS-only&mdash;but there&#8217;s almost no enforcement by Apple, meaning that it&#8217;s easy to download an app that you can&#8217;t really use. It&#8217;s getting to the point that there needs to be separate sections for each device, or some kind of rudimentary search or sort parameter for filtering out incompatible software.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve needed a fix for fragmentation for a while, and hopefully the iPad, being such an obviously distinct device, will give Apple the kick in the ass they need to implement one. The iPad may run all iPhone apps, but the iPhone will not necessarily run all <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipadapps" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2Ftag%2Fipadapps%2F&sref=rss">iPad apps</a>, so assuming downloads aren&#8217;t required to be packaged together as dual-mode iPad/iPhone apps, there will <em>have</em> to be a way to prevent purchasers from accidentally purchasing something they can&#8217;t use at all on their iPhone. An improved, properly segmented App Store storefront or download system is inevitable; we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see what it looks like.</p>
<h2>Data Will Be Freed</h2>
<p>In some iterations, the iPad is a 3G-capable device, and in all, it has a microphone. What it never has is built-in voice capabilities&mdash;that is, unless you download them. According to <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5458498%2Fapple-now-allowing-voip-over-3g-could-ipad-calls-be-next&sref=rss">early reports</a>, the new iPad and iPhone SDK has lifted the restriction on voice calls over 3G data (VoIPo3G?). Opening up voice over data services for the iPad could have a larger effect on iPhone apps than on iPad apps, since, you know, they&#8217;re <em>for phones</em>.<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/thumb160x_skypee.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />AT&#038;T isn&#8217;t the first wireless company to allow voice over 3G data, and the iPhone is far from the first phone to support it, but for both to now be onboard with a <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5459260%2Ffring-iphone-app-allows-skype-calls-over-3g&sref=rss">technology</a> that threatens a core feature of carriers&#8217; business plans is a very, very good sign.<br clear="all"/></p>
<h2>In-App Purchasing Will Finally Take Off</h2>
<p>The iPad will ship with a book store, but what about all those fancy magazines? (Or to adopt their parlance, &#8220;WHITHER THE PERIODICAL?&#8221;) If print publications were placing their future success in Apple&#8217;s hands, Apple&#8217;s just handed it right back. Unlike books, which will be sold directly through an iTunes-style storefront and viewed through a common interface, magazines and newspapers will be in charge of selling their own apps, with their own interfaces, and their own business models. But this could turn out to be a good thing.<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_500x_nytimes2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br />
Imagine an icon on your iPad. When you tap it, it&#8217;ll open up your favorite magazine, in full color, with magazine-style formatting and interactive content. The app itself is free, but the content is not&mdash;new issues come either individually, at newsstand-ish prices, or through a subscription. They will compete with one another to provide the best e-magazine experience. Unique, miniature storefronts, selling content for anything from a single publication to an entire publishing empire: <em>this</em> is the kind of thing the App Store&#8217;s in-app purchase system was made for.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s funny about this is that in-app purchases are still App Store transactions, carried out through the same payment system and with a portion of revenues set aside for Apple. Nothing will change except the packaging, but that alone will be enough to fundamentally change the App Store economy, and how we pay for print content. (Increased dependence on in-app purchases could help stem the tide of piracy as well, but that&#8217;s another discussion entirely. Soon!)</p>
<p><em>Note: Apple may be faced with some resistance in this model, though, since magazine publishers would much rather handle billing themselves, if just for the valuable data they could glean about their subscribers.</em></p>
<h2>&#8220;Apps&#8221; Will Grow Into &#8220;Applications&#8221;</h2>
<p>Apps are small, they&#8217;re simple, they&#8217;ve got a short title. They&#8217;re like <em>applications</em>, but nuggetized. And that&#8217;s fine! We call software on phones by a different name than we call software on PCs, because something about the products feels different. The iPad could bridge that gap.<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iwork.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br />
The SDK has been out for less than two days, so nobody has had time to really delve into the app potential of the iPad. Except, of course, Apple. Steve Jobs spent what probably seemed like too long on iWork for the iPad, a set of <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gizmodo.com%2F5458327%2Fiwork-2010-apple-brings-multitouch-cloud%2Bbased-office-to-ipad&sref=rss">$10-a-pop apps</a> that Apple fully redesigned for the iPad&#8217;s touch interface which are an order of magnitude more complex than anything on the iPhone right now. (Our friend John Mahoney at <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.popsci.com%2Fgadgets%2Farticle%2F2010-01%2Fipads-unexpected-hidden-peak-future-computing&sref=rss">PopSci</a> goes so far as to say these are a sneak preview of Apple&#8217;s entire future software philosophy. He could be right.)</p>
<p>Of course, these are Apple apps, so you&#8217;d expect them to be executed well, and to use Apple&#8217;s device to its maximum potential. But with more screen real estate, more power, serious text entry abilities and a more mature SDK at their disposal, the developers are going to give us apps of an entirely new caliber, not just a new size.</p>
<h2>Apple Will Rule With an Iron Fist, Or Learn to <em>Let Things Go</em></h2>
<p>With <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gizmodo.com%2F5458325%2Fapple-ipad-ebook-app-is-called-ibooks&sref=rss">iBooks</a>, Apple is setting itself up for an awkward situation. Apple has strict (if sometimes inscrutable) rules about what types of apps are permitted, mostly concerning appropriateness of content and the safety and stability of the app&#8217;s code. The prohibition that always rubbed developers and customers the wrong way, though, is the ban on apps that duplicate the functionality of Apple&#8217;s apps, like email clients, new browsers, and by extension, alternative music stores and app stores. These are now joined by iBooks, which is unique in that its actually <em>invading</em> territory inhabited by preexisting apps, like Amazon&#8217;s Kindle app and indie favorites like Stanza. So what does Apple do? Do they purge Kindle and co. from the App Store, or mark ereader apps as incompatible with the iPad? The Kindle app is to iBooks what an Amazon MP3 store app would be to iTunes, all the way down to the competing file formats and DRM systems (iBooks renders a proprietary type of ePub file, while the Kindle sells books in a proprietary AZW format), so even if this would be a terribly dickish thing to do, it&#8217;s <em>possible</em>.<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_ebooks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br />
The more likely path is a continuation of the gradual erosion of Apple&#8217;s tight grip on the App Store. Along with explicit, proactive feature additions like the ones we saw in OS 3.0, Apple&#8217;s been letting more and more types of apps slide through the approval process. The Rhapsody app may not provide a plain music download service like iTunes, but it is music that you pay for, in an app that doesn&#8217;t come from Apple. you may not be able to download a browser with an entirely new rendering engine, but now you <em>can</em> download a cornucopia of alternative browsers that render through WebKit. Some apps can stream video over 3G now; others can broadcast voice communication over AT&#038;T&#8217;s data network. It&#8217;s too early to presume, but if iBooks doesn&#8217;t murder its competition, Apple could be charting a course toward a more open App Store, not a more tightly controlled one.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2Ftag%2Fipad&sref=rss">The iPad on Giz</a>]</p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/44464/more-apps-more-problems-how-the-ipad-will-change-the-app-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Complete iPhone v.4 Rumor Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.dv-depot.com/43255/the-complete-iphone-v-4-rumor-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dv-depot.com/43255/the-complete-iphone-v-4-rumor-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>othertech</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[modo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3gs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4g Wireless Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone4g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iterations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June 29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newiphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next Gen Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Gizmodo-5451175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/iphoneunicorn.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iphoneunicorn.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Yes, the Apple Tablet is coming next week! But do you know what gets me even more excited? A new version of the iPhone. But how will it be different? Let's look at the rumors.</p>
<h2>Will it be announced on January 27th?</h2>
<p>While the original iPhone was announced in January 2007, a full six months before it was released, the 3G was announced two months before its release and most recent version, the 3GS, was announced a mere month before its release. There's no real reason for Apple to announce a new version of the iPhone months before its release at this point, and if they really are announcing the tablet on the 27th, there's no reason to overdo it by announcing both. The only way they'd announce it next week is if it was being released much sooner than anticipated. <b>Probability: 20%</b></p>
<h2>When is it coming out?</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/thumb160x_smoothjimmy.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Yes, a new iPhone will be released this year. Foxconn, Apple's main manufacturer, is rumored to have <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5423213/rumor-foxconn-may-have-received-order-for-next-generation-iphone-4">already received the order</a>. But when, exactly, should we expect to see it?</p>
<p>If Apple continues along the schedule they've stuck to for the past three iterations, look for the iPhone 4 to drop this summer. The original iPhone dropped on June 29, 2007, the 3G came on July 11, 2008 and the 3GS arrived on June 19, 2009. While there have been <a href="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2010/01/133_58873.html">rumors about a new iPhone showing up in April</a>, those are sketchy at best. The good money is on late June/Early July. <b>Probability: 95%</b></p>
<h2>Will it run on a 4G wireless network?</h2>
<p>The 3G and 3GS both run on AT&#38;T's 3G network, with the 3GS supporting the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5295789/giz-explains-what-atts-72mbps-network-really-means">speedier 7.2 Mbps HSDPA network</a>. AT&#38;T is also working on its <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5168035/giz-explains-why-wimax-and-lte-wireless-4g-data-will-blow-your-mind">4G LTE network</a>, and some people think the next-gen iPhone could run on that.</p>
<p>It's unlikely. 3G networks were technically available when the first iPhone was released, but Apple held off until the network was robust enough to handle a good number of people before releasing the 3G. And LTE phones are probably a good six months off still, so expect the new iPhone to continue running on the 7.2 Mbps HSDPA network.</p>
<p>The good news is that the network is far from running at full capacity, so as AT&#38;T beefs it up we should see speeds increase until the v5 LTE iPhone shows up in 2011. <b>Probability: 10%</b></p>
<h2>OMG is it coming to Verizon?!</h2>
<p>One analyst <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5440682/apple-and-verizon-disagreeing-on-cdma-iphone-pricing-analyst-says">seems to think so</a>, and he also claims Apple and Verizon are disagreeing on pricing. Unfortunately, these claims are just his assumptions and aren't based on any solid information, as is analyst's wont.</p>
<p>The real motivation for Apple to bring the phone to Verizon is that AT&#38;T's serious network limitations in NYC and SF have given the iPhone's once-sterling reputation a black eye. Add to that the fact that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5439908/android-taking-wind-out-of-iphones-sails">Android is starting to encroach on Apple's hype train</a>, and you've got the makings of a good time to expand to other networks.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/chart.gif"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_chart.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>However, the fact that Apple would need to make a totally new iPhone to run on Verizon's (and Sprint's, for that matter) CDMA network is a big roadblock here. It's not insurmountable, however. Verizon would have to be willing to play ball (although <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430123/remainders-+-the-good-bad-and-ugly-things-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/">they've given hints of that lately</a>), and a lot would have to be worked out.</p>
<p>Our guess is that this is still another year away. After all, both Verizon and AT&#38;T are turning to LTE for their 4G networks, which would make it easier to release one LTE iPhone for both networks. And we all know how Apple likes to keep its product lines simple. <b>Probability: 30% that it happens this year, 60% next year</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/iphone-3g-s-fully-disassembled1_02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iphone-3g-s-fully-disassembled1_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>What processor will it have?</h2>
<p>The <a href="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2010/01/133_58873.html">sketchy source</a> that claimed the new iPhone would be out in April also claimed that it will feature a multi-core ARM Cortex-A9, capable of speeds over 2GHz. While the source isn't great, this part of the rumor isn't out of the realm of possibility.</p>
<p>Another option is Apple using chips designed by PA Semi, their in-house chip foundry. There are rumors of PA Semi chips <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5441816/more-rumors-apple-will-use-its-own-chip-tech-for-the-apple-tablet">running the forthcoming tablet</a>, and it would make sense that Apple would go a similar route for the next iPhone. Specs are unclear, but it's safe to say that it would be a bump up from the 3GS.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/screen_shot_2010-01-12_at_8.48.10_pm.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_screen_shot_2010-01-12_at_8.48.10_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>How much storage will it have?</h2>
<p>64GB, probably. Both <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5446854/samsungs-64gb-chip-means-serious-storage-for-iphones-and-pmps">Samsung</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5426668/toshiba-develops-64gb-nand-chip-just-in-time-for-a-64gb-iphone-3gs">Toshiba</a> have some new 64GB NAND chips that are exactly what Apple would put in an updated iPhone. And the 3GS already has 32GB, so doubling that number is a pretty obvious upgrade. <b>Probability: 95%</b></p>
<h2>What about the graphics chip?</h2>
<p>Imagination Technologies, the company behind the iPhone 3GS's PowerVR SGX535 GPU, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5443848/this-might-be-the-next-iphones-graphics-chip">recently announced the next version in that line</a>, the SGX545. It has OpenGL 3.2 and Open CL 1.0 support, runs at 200MHz, supports DirectX 10.1 and can do HD output. It seems like a natural next step for the guts of the iPhone, unless Apple wanted to keep the product line simpler by continuing to use the 3GS GPU for another year. Another GPU upgrade would allow for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5286263/will-future-iphone-games-run-on-your-iphone-3g">more visually impressive games</a>, just not on older models. <b>Probability: 85%</b></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iphone-third-eye.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Will it have video chat?</h2>
<p>This was strongly rumored for the 3GS, but didn't happen: a second camera on the front of the phone, allowing for mobile video chat. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416494/where-is-my-iphone-videochat-apple">Jesus wants it</a> very badly.</p>
<p>The main argument against this happening is that AT&#38;T's network just couldn't handle it, which is probably true. But it could be done with a Wi-Fi-only implementation. Then again, maybe it's just one of those features that just sounds better than it actually is; the idea of holding your phone up in front of your face at arm's length seems pretty stupid to me. <b>Probability: 30%</b></p>
<h2>Potential New Features</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/nexusonereview_7.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_nexusonereview_7.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>A High-Res AMOLED Screen:</b><br />
The iPhone's screen is starting to look a little dated when compared to the beauties found on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Motorola Droid</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5443835/nexus-one-review">Nexus One</a>. The Droid's screen is 3.7 inches with a 480x854 resolution, while the Nexus One sports a particularly lovely 3.7-inch AMOLED screen with a 480x800 resolution. Compare these numbers to the iPhone, which sports a 3.5-inch LCD screen with a resolution of 320x480, and it becomes clear that a screen upgrade is inevitable.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Apple filed a patent for a <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/01/07/apple_investigates_slimmer_lighter_dual_function_touchscreens.html">slimmer, lighter dual-function touchscreen</a> back in 2008. The new touchscreens feature capacitors included in the pixels of the screen, able to operate individually, eliminating the need for a touch sensor panel overlaid on the display. This would allow the screens to be manufactured more cheaply and easily while also allowing for a thinner profile.</p>
<p>Whether or not the new screens are AMOLEDs or Apple's new LCD technology, the chances are good that the resolution will get a bump. The trouble is that all of the apps in the App Store have been coded for a native resolution of 320x480, so a lot of work will have to be done to get those upscaled for a higher-resolution screen. That's no reason to keep a last-gen screen on a new product, however, so we think a resolution upgrade is highly likely. <b>Probability: 90%</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/applestyluspatent.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_applestyluspatent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>A Stylus:</b><br />
A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5448060/apple-patents-show-iphone-stylus-and-contextual-interfaces">recently-unearthed Apple patent</a> shows an iPhone being used with a stylus with a conductive tip. The patent was filed back in July of 2008, however, so this seems like more of an ass-covering patent than a product-defining patent. After all, Steve famously said "yuck" to styluses at the first iPhone keynote. So the chances of the new iPhone coming with a stylus are slim to none. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
<p><b>Removable Battery:</b><br />
The <a href="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2010/01/133_58873.html">same flimsy source</a> that claimed that the new iPhone will be released in April also said we should expect a removable battery. This is highly doubtful. Apple has just revamped all of its laptops to have non-user-removable batteries, why would it suddenly do an about-face with the new iPhone? Don't count on it. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
<p><b>Touch-Sensitive Casing:</b><br />
This is an interesting one. A Goldman Sachs analyst seems to think that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5448003/rumor-iphone-4-casing-will-be-touch+sensitive-like-the-magic-mouse">back of the new iPhone will be touch-sensitive</a>, like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386202/apple-magic-mouse-review">Magic Mouse</a>. This would allow for gesture-based control, like scrolling, without your fat fingers blocking the screen. This one's purely speculative, but makes a certain amount of sense. <b>Probability: 35%</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/ipod_touch_teardown.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_ipod_touch_teardown.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>Wireless N Support:</b><br />
This one is pretty obvious. The newest <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357667/new-ipod-touch-teardown-reveals-80211n-fm-transmission-hardware-plus-room-for-nano-camera">iPod Touch already has a Broadcom BCM4329 chip inside</a> that supports 802.11n and FM transmission, so it's natural that the next iPhone would get the same thing. A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5438139/wireless-n-support-in-next-gen-iphone-implied-by-apple-job-posting">recent job posting</a> by Apple for a Wi-Fi software engineer just adds credence to the rumor. <b>Probability: 95%</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/iphone-camera.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iphone-camera.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>5-Megapixel Camera:</b><br />
Digitimes claims that OmniVision Technologies, the company behind the iPhone 3GS's 3.2-megapixel CMOS image sensor, has won a new contract with Apple to produce <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5432786/next+generation-iphone-may-have-5+megapixel-camera-sources-claim">millions of 5-megapixel sensors this year</a>. This one makes sense, as the MP count (as well as storage size) is one of the most basic ways to show that the phone's been upgraded. <b>Probability: 95%</b></p>
<p><b>LED Flash:</b><br />
On the one hand, the iPhone's camera could be better, especially in low light, and a flash could help with that. On the other hand, cellphone flashes are almost universally terrible and useless. Nevertheless, there's a rumor out there that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5443845/apple-reportedly-looking-for-led-flash-components-for-next-iphone">Apple has ordered "tens of millions" of Philips' LumiLEDs</a>. <b>Probability: 60%</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/pushbuttonantenna.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_pushbuttonantenna.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>Push-Button Antenna:</b><br />
Apple filed a patent for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5436604/well-thats-one-way-to-fix-the-iphones-crappy-reception">an antenna that pops out like a button</a>. This looks to pretty clearly them covering their asses rather than leaking new product designs, so don't count on seeing a big, ugly antenna button popping out of the top of the new iPhone. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_apple-dock-patent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>Spongey Dock:</b><br />
This is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424077/apple-patent-shows-dock-made-from-elastic-sponge+like-substance-that-conforms-to-shape-of-ipodiphone">another weirdo patent</a>, one that in all likelihood will never actually be made. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_appletablet2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>A Bumpy Screen:</b><br />
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5433988/apple-patent-application-reveals-a-bumpy-tablet">Yet another patent</a> that could be for a tablet or a phone, this shows a touchscreen device with a screen that "create[s] physical bumps or dots for the user to feel when it is in keyboard mode." Interesting! But also, merely a patent, and a left-field patent at that. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fiphoneunicorn.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iphoneunicorn.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Yes, the Apple Tablet is coming next week! But do you know what gets me even more excited? A new version of the iPhone. But how will it be different? Let&#8217;s look at the rumors.</p>
<h2>Will it be announced on January 27th?</h2>
<p>While the original iPhone was announced in January 2007, a full six months before it was released, the 3G was announced two months before its release and most recent version, the 3GS, was announced a mere month before its release. There&#8217;s no real reason for Apple to announce a new version of the iPhone months before its release at this point, and if they really are announcing the tablet on the 27th, there&#8217;s no reason to overdo it by announcing both. The only way they&#8217;d announce it next week is if it was being released much sooner than anticipated. <b>Probability: 20%</b></p>
<h2>When is it coming out?</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/thumb160x_smoothjimmy.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Yes, a new iPhone will be released this year. Foxconn, Apple&#8217;s main manufacturer, is rumored to have <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5423213%2Frumor-foxconn-may-have-received-order-for-next-generation-iphone-4&sref=rss">already received the order</a>. But when, exactly, should we expect to see it?</p>
<p>If Apple continues along the schedule they&#8217;ve stuck to for the past three iterations, look for the iPhone 4 to drop this summer. The original iPhone dropped on June 29, 2007, the 3G came on July 11, 2008 and the 3GS arrived on June 19, 2009. While there have been <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.koreatimes.co.kr%2Fwww%2Fnews%2Ftech%2F2010%2F01%2F133_58873.html&sref=rss">rumors about a new iPhone showing up in April</a>, those are sketchy at best. The good money is on late June/Early July. <b>Probability: 95%</b></p>
<h2>Will it run on a 4G wireless network?</h2>
<p>The 3G and 3GS both run on AT&#038;T&#8217;s 3G network, with the 3GS supporting the <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5295789%2Fgiz-explains-what-atts-72mbps-network-really-means&sref=rss">speedier 7.2 Mbps HSDPA network</a>. AT&#038;T is also working on its <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5168035%2Fgiz-explains-why-wimax-and-lte-wireless-4g-data-will-blow-your-mind&sref=rss">4G LTE network</a>, and some people think the next-gen iPhone could run on that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unlikely. 3G networks were technically available when the first iPhone was released, but Apple held off until the network was robust enough to handle a good number of people before releasing the 3G. And LTE phones are probably a good six months off still, so expect the new iPhone to continue running on the 7.2 Mbps HSDPA network.</p>
<p>The good news is that the network is far from running at full capacity, so as AT&#038;T beefs it up we should see speeds increase until the v5 LTE iPhone shows up in 2011. <b>Probability: 10%</b></p>
<h2>OMG is it coming to Verizon?!</h2>
<p>One analyst <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5440682%2Fapple-and-verizon-disagreeing-on-cdma-iphone-pricing-analyst-says&sref=rss">seems to think so</a>, and he also claims Apple and Verizon are disagreeing on pricing. Unfortunately, these claims are just his assumptions and aren&#8217;t based on any solid information, as is analyst&#8217;s wont.</p>
<p>The real motivation for Apple to bring the phone to Verizon is that AT&#038;T&#8217;s serious network limitations in NYC and SF have given the iPhone&#8217;s once-sterling reputation a black eye. Add to that the fact that <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5439908%2Fandroid-taking-wind-out-of-iphones-sails&sref=rss">Android is starting to encroach on Apple&#8217;s hype train</a>, and you&#8217;ve got the makings of a good time to expand to other networks.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fchart.gif&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_chart.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>However, the fact that Apple would need to make a totally new iPhone to run on Verizon&#8217;s (and Sprint&#8217;s, for that matter) CDMA network is a big roadblock here. It&#8217;s not insurmountable, however. Verizon would have to be willing to play ball (although <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5430123%2Fremainders-%2B-the-good-bad-and-ugly-things-we-didnt-post-and-why%2Fgallery%2F&sref=rss">they&#8217;ve given hints of that lately</a>), and a lot would have to be worked out.</p>
<p>Our guess is that this is still another year away. After all, both Verizon and AT&#038;T are turning to LTE for their 4G networks, which would make it easier to release one LTE iPhone for both networks. And we all know how Apple likes to keep its product lines simple. <b>Probability: 30% that it happens this year, 60% next year</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fiphone-3g-s-fully-disassembled1_02.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iphone-3g-s-fully-disassembled1_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>What processor will it have?</h2>
<p>The <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.koreatimes.co.kr%2Fwww%2Fnews%2Ftech%2F2010%2F01%2F133_58873.html&sref=rss">sketchy source</a> that claimed the new iPhone would be out in April also claimed that it will feature a multi-core ARM Cortex-A9, capable of speeds over 2GHz. While the source isn&#8217;t great, this part of the rumor isn&#8217;t out of the realm of possibility.</p>
<p>Another option is Apple using chips designed by PA Semi, their in-house chip foundry. There are rumors of PA Semi chips <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5441816%2Fmore-rumors-apple-will-use-its-own-chip-tech-for-the-apple-tablet&sref=rss">running the forthcoming tablet</a>, and it would make sense that Apple would go a similar route for the next iPhone. Specs are unclear, but it&#8217;s safe to say that it would be a bump up from the 3GS.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fscreen_shot_2010-01-12_at_8.48.10_pm.png&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_screen_shot_2010-01-12_at_8.48.10_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>How much storage will it have?</h2>
<p>64GB, probably. Both <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5446854%2Fsamsungs-64gb-chip-means-serious-storage-for-iphones-and-pmps&sref=rss">Samsung</a> and <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5426668%2Ftoshiba-develops-64gb-nand-chip-just-in-time-for-a-64gb-iphone-3gs&sref=rss">Toshiba</a> have some new 64GB NAND chips that are exactly what Apple would put in an updated iPhone. And the 3GS already has 32GB, so doubling that number is a pretty obvious upgrade. <b>Probability: 95%</b></p>
<h2>What about the graphics chip?</h2>
<p>Imagination Technologies, the company behind the iPhone 3GS&#8217;s PowerVR SGX535 GPU, <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5443848%2Fthis-might-be-the-next-iphones-graphics-chip&sref=rss">recently announced the next version in that line</a>, the SGX545. It has OpenGL 3.2 and Open CL 1.0 support, runs at 200MHz, supports DirectX 10.1 and can do HD output. It seems like a natural next step for the guts of the iPhone, unless Apple wanted to keep the product line simpler by continuing to use the 3GS GPU for another year. Another GPU upgrade would allow for <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5286263%2Fwill-future-iphone-games-run-on-your-iphone-3g&sref=rss">more visually impressive games</a>, just not on older models. <b>Probability: 85%</b></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iphone-third-eye.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Will it have video chat?</h2>
<p>This was strongly rumored for the 3GS, but didn&#8217;t happen: a second camera on the front of the phone, allowing for mobile video chat. <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5416494%2Fwhere-is-my-iphone-videochat-apple&sref=rss">Jesus wants it</a> very badly.</p>
<p>The main argument against this happening is that AT&#038;T&#8217;s network just couldn&#8217;t handle it, which is probably true. But it could be done with a Wi-Fi-only implementation. Then again, maybe it&#8217;s just one of those features that just sounds better than it actually is; the idea of holding your phone up in front of your face at arm&#8217;s length seems pretty stupid to me. <b>Probability: 30%</b></p>
<h2>Potential New Features</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fnexusonereview_7.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_nexusonereview_7.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>A High-Res AMOLED Screen:</b><br />
The iPhone&#8217;s screen is starting to look a little dated when compared to the beauties found on the <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5396168%2Fmotorola-droid-review&sref=rss">Motorola Droid</a> and the <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5443835%2Fnexus-one-review&sref=rss">Nexus One</a>. The Droid&#8217;s screen is 3.7 inches with a 480&#215;854 resolution, while the Nexus One sports a particularly lovely 3.7-inch AMOLED screen with a 480&#215;800 resolution. Compare these numbers to the iPhone, which sports a 3.5-inch LCD screen with a resolution of 320&#215;480, and it becomes clear that a screen upgrade is inevitable.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Apple filed a patent for a <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.appleinsider.com%2Farticles%2F10%2F01%2F07%2Fapple_investigates_slimmer_lighter_dual_function_touchscreens.html&sref=rss">slimmer, lighter dual-function touchscreen</a> back in 2008. The new touchscreens feature capacitors included in the pixels of the screen, able to operate individually, eliminating the need for a touch sensor panel overlaid on the display. This would allow the screens to be manufactured more cheaply and easily while also allowing for a thinner profile.</p>
<p>Whether or not the new screens are AMOLEDs or Apple&#8217;s new LCD technology, the chances are good that the resolution will get a bump. The trouble is that all of the apps in the App Store have been coded for a native resolution of 320&#215;480, so a lot of work will have to be done to get those upscaled for a higher-resolution screen. That&#8217;s no reason to keep a last-gen screen on a new product, however, so we think a resolution upgrade is highly likely. <b>Probability: 90%</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fapplestyluspatent.png&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_applestyluspatent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>A Stylus:</b><br />
A <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5448060%2Fapple-patents-show-iphone-stylus-and-contextual-interfaces&sref=rss">recently-unearthed Apple patent</a> shows an iPhone being used with a stylus with a conductive tip. The patent was filed back in July of 2008, however, so this seems like more of an ass-covering patent than a product-defining patent. After all, Steve famously said &#8220;yuck&#8221; to styluses at the first iPhone keynote. So the chances of the new iPhone coming with a stylus are slim to none. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
<p><b>Removable Battery:</b><br />
The <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.koreatimes.co.kr%2Fwww%2Fnews%2Ftech%2F2010%2F01%2F133_58873.html&sref=rss">same flimsy source</a> that claimed that the new iPhone will be released in April also said we should expect a removable battery. This is highly doubtful. Apple has just revamped all of its laptops to have non-user-removable batteries, why would it suddenly do an about-face with the new iPhone? Don&#8217;t count on it. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
<p><b>Touch-Sensitive Casing:</b><br />
This is an interesting one. A Goldman Sachs analyst seems to think that the <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5448003%2Frumor-iphone-4-casing-will-be-touch%2Bsensitive-like-the-magic-mouse&sref=rss">back of the new iPhone will be touch-sensitive</a>, like the <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5386202%2Fapple-magic-mouse-review&sref=rss">Magic Mouse</a>. This would allow for gesture-based control, like scrolling, without your fat fingers blocking the screen. This one&#8217;s purely speculative, but makes a certain amount of sense. <b>Probability: 35%</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fipod_touch_teardown.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_ipod_touch_teardown.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>Wireless N Support:</b><br />
This one is pretty obvious. The newest <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5357667%2Fnew-ipod-touch-teardown-reveals-80211n-fm-transmission-hardware-plus-room-for-nano-camera&sref=rss">iPod Touch already has a Broadcom BCM4329 chip inside</a> that supports 802.11n and FM transmission, so it&#8217;s natural that the next iPhone would get the same thing. A <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5438139%2Fwireless-n-support-in-next-gen-iphone-implied-by-apple-job-posting&sref=rss">recent job posting</a> by Apple for a Wi-Fi software engineer just adds credence to the rumor. <b>Probability: 95%</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fiphone-camera.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_iphone-camera.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>5-Megapixel Camera:</b><br />
Digitimes claims that OmniVision Technologies, the company behind the iPhone 3GS&#8217;s 3.2-megapixel CMOS image sensor, has won a new contract with Apple to produce <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5432786%2Fnext%2Bgeneration-iphone-may-have-5%2Bmegapixel-camera-sources-claim&sref=rss">millions of 5-megapixel sensors this year</a>. This one makes sense, as the MP count (as well as storage size) is one of the most basic ways to show that the phone&#8217;s been upgraded. <b>Probability: 95%</b></p>
<p><b>LED Flash:</b><br />
On the one hand, the iPhone&#8217;s camera could be better, especially in low light, and a flash could help with that. On the other hand, cellphone flashes are almost universally terrible and useless. Nevertheless, there&#8217;s a rumor out there that <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5443845%2Fapple-reportedly-looking-for-led-flash-components-for-next-iphone&sref=rss">Apple has ordered &#8220;tens of millions&#8221; of Philips&#8217; LumiLEDs</a>. <b>Probability: 60%</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.gawker.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2F4%2F2010%2F01%2Fpushbuttonantenna.jpg&sref=rss"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_pushbuttonantenna.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>Push-Button Antenna:</b><br />
Apple filed a patent for <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5436604%2Fwell-thats-one-way-to-fix-the-iphones-crappy-reception&sref=rss">an antenna that pops out like a button</a>. This looks to pretty clearly them covering their asses rather than leaking new product designs, so don&#8217;t count on seeing a big, ugly antenna button popping out of the top of the new iPhone. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_apple-dock-patent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>Spongey Dock:</b><br />
This is <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5424077%2Fapple-patent-shows-dock-made-from-elastic-sponge%2Blike-substance-that-conforms-to-shape-of-ipodiphone&sref=rss">another weirdo patent</a>, one that in all likelihood will never actually be made. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_appletablet2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>A Bumpy Screen:</b><br />
<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=21261X792902&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2F5433988%2Fapple-patent-application-reveals-a-bumpy-tablet&sref=rss">Yet another patent</a> that could be for a tablet or a phone, this shows a touchscreen device with a screen that &#8220;create[s] physical bumps or dots for the user to feel when it is in keyboard mode.&#8221; Interesting! But also, merely a patent, and a left-field patent at that. <b>Probability: 5%</b></p>

<div class="skimlinks-disclosure-button"><p><script class="skimlinks_ref_script" type="text/javascript" src="http://static.skimlinks.com/api/ref.js?p=21261&amp;d=792902&amp;t=1"></script></p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dv-depot.com/43255/the-complete-iphone-v-4-rumor-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

