Posts Tagged Transition

Sony Ericsson to shut down Sync service, recommends Google Sync instead

Posted by on Monday, 28 November, 2011
Like bubbles casually floating on the horizon, Sony Ericsson’s Sync service is about to fade into obscurity. Last week, the company formerly known as Sony Ericsson confirmed that Sync will be shut down on December 29th, in favor of similar offerings from Google and other companies. In a statement posted to its site, the manufacturer explained that the service had to be cut, “since it was meant for old generation phones and our aim is to create a more enhanced and integrated smartphone experience for you.” Sony Ericsson suggests using Google Sync as an alternative, though Plaxo and UNYK are also viable. Check out the source link below for detailed instructions on how to make the transition.

Sony Ericsson to shut down Sync service, recommends Google Sync instead originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:35:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceSony Ericsson  | Email this | Comments
Engadget


7 Tools to Make Going Back to the Office Suck Less [Toolkit]

Posted by on Monday, 5 September, 2011

How Chartbeat wants to help save the media industry

Posted by on Sunday, 31 July, 2011

Newspapers and magazines used to publish content into a kind of void: they knew how many people subscribed, but that was about it — everything else was guesswork based on consumer surveys and other mumbo-jumbo. But online, every click and interaction can be tracked and charted and graphed over time, to create a picture of what is happening at any minute of the day. Is that good or bad for the news business? Tony Haile, general manager of Chartbeat, is convinced that the more information a publisher has, the better job they can do, and he has just launched a new service called Newsbeat to help provide that data.

Chartbeat — which was launched in 2009 by Betaworks, the New York-based incubator run by John Borthwick — provides real-time analytics for websites of all kinds, with a dashboard that shows how many people are reading a particular page at any given minute, as well as where they came from and how long they have been on the site. But in an interview with GigaOM, Haile says he wanted to create something specifically designed for publishers, in the hope that more information could help the media industry through the transition it is currently struggling with from the print world to a digital one.

Not funnels but engagement

The way publishers think about analytical data, Haile notes, is very different from the way that e-commerce companies do. Anyone who is selling something is obsessed with “funnels” — in other words, how well their site moves someone to the point where they will buy the product. Publishers, however, are more concerned about where their traffic is coming from and maximizing that (as well as engagement with readers), because for the most part their business is advertising-based. Said Haile:

For me, the most interesting thing was that this is an industry in complete transition. It’s moving away from the ‘fire-and-forget’ model of publishing to one that is much more adaptive and iterative. We thought ‘What does the newsroom look like in five years, and how can we help build it now?’

While Chartbeat shows real-time analytics for a site, Haile says Newsbeat has more data that publishers would be interested in — including detailed data about every story on a site (Chartbeat only provides detailed info for the top 20 most-read pages on a site) as well as social-sharing information. For example, one tab of data for each story shows a “sound wave-style” graph of Twitter-related activity related to that story, which an editor or writer can zoom in on and see who has been posting a link or mentioning the story on Twitter. Newsbeat also ranks the tweets based on the Klout “influence score” of the user, Haile says, so that publishers can see which tweets matter.

Chartbeat created Newsbeat by working with a group of mainstream media companies, including Forbes, Time magazine and the Wall Street Journal, as well as some new media entities such as Gawker and Fast Company. But won’t focusing so much on real-time data about traffic patterns create a “race to the bottom,” as everyone chases the high-traffic stories about Brittany Spears or Lady Gaga? Haile says he has heard all of these horror stories, but he doesn’t believe them.

Seeing how readers are responding is good

Traffic data might show that readers are really interested in racy photos of a celebrity, he says, which might help convince Gawker Media or some other outlet to focus on them, but it’s not going to make the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal do so. “Journalists deserve more credit than they get,” says the Chartbeat GM. “Knowing how readers are responding to what they’re writing isn’t going to change the way most of them write about the things that matter to them. This data is never going to result in the ‘tyranny of the popular’ — it’s just not going to happen.”

Haile said that even some of the most vociferous critics he has run into inside newsrooms are starting to see the value of the information Newsbeat provides. “I heard one of these guys say ‘It’s not enough for me to write about these important stories — I need to know that people have read them. I need to know if the headline isn’t drawing people in, or if they aren’t getting to the important point in the fourth paragraph.’”

One of the things the software can do, Haile says, is alert editors and publishers when something unusual is happening in the traffic pattern for a story. After ingesting enough of the data about a site, Newsbeat can predict what kind of readership a specific story will get during a day, Haile says, and if there is a sudden spike in readers it can alert an editor, so they can take advantage of that attention. He notes that Gawker founder Nick Denton has talked about how he built traffic at the network by spotting stories that were spiking in interest and then “doubling down” on them by throwing more resources at them.

The audience may be smarter than you think

And not only will this data not accelerate a “race to the bottom” with respect to content, Haile says it can actually help do the opposite: the Chartbeat GM says that one of the major publishers the company was working with looked at the data from Newsbeat and saw that two stories were getting large amounts of traffic: one about a case of infanticide in France and the other about Iraq. The number one story on the front page of the site was about season two of The Jersey Shore, and it was getting hardly any traffic at all — and neither of the two most-read stories were above the fold on the home page.

“So in that case, the site had an audience that was actually smarter than they thought they were,” says Haile. “Sometimes we underestimate our audience, and this can help websites see that and change the way they are doing things.”

Will the kind of data that Newsbeat provides allow some editors to become even more obsessed with lowest-common denominator stories? Undoubtedly. But I think Haile is right when he says it can also do the opposite, and show news publishers when they are misunderstanding what their readers are interested in — and it can let individual writers see whether what they are writing is having an impact or not, as well as showing them who their biggest fans are when it comes to referring traffic. As publishers try to become more efficient at serving their markets, that is clearly valuable information.

Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user Steve Snodgrass

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • A field guide to cloud computing: current trends, future opportunities
  • The rise of tablets in the enterprise
  • The state of the e-book lending market: Business models and challenges



alt=''
border='0'
/>


GigaOM — Tech News, Analysis and Trends


The NYT: Portrait of an Old Media Giant in Transition

Posted by on Saturday, 23 April, 2011

The New York Times Co. released financial results for its most recent quarter on Thursday morning. More than anything, they are a snapshot of a traditional media giant that is trying desperately to move into the digital future, but keeps getting dragged back down by the weight of its declining legacy businesses. The paper’s newly launched “metered access” pay plan has brought in 100,000 subscribers, and its online advertising revenue rose. But that was more than offset by a sharp drop in profits and a continuing decline in ad revenue. For the NYT, it seems to be one step forward and two steps backwards.

Not surprisingly, the Times tried to focus on the good news: that about 100,000 people have signed up as a result of its subscription plan (although visitors and pageviews have fallen, according to some estimates). Although the news outlet didn’t give specific dollar figures, those subscriptions will likely produce about million in annual revenue for the company — depending on how many of them signed up for the initial discounted offer of 99 cents a week. As Felix Salmon of Reuters noted, signing up 100,000 new subscribers puts the newspaper one-third of the way to its target for the year.

So much for the good news. Unfortunately for the NYT, making million in a year from its subscription plan is a drop in the financial bucket: the company’s operating costs for its News Media Group, which includes the New York Times and the Boston Globe, were 0 million for the first quarter alone. Even if the subscription plan hits its goal of 300,000 subscribers, it will only generate about million in revenue, which is barely enough to move the needle for a company of the NYT’s size — and that’s not including the cost of implementing the wall in the first place.

The bad news in the paper’s financial statements spilled from almost every line: profit for the quarter fell by more than 50 percent, and operating profit was down by almost 30 percent. Advertising revenue fell by more than 4 percent compared with the previous year, circulation revenues fell by almost 4 percent as well, and newsprint expenses climbed by almost 13 percent. Digital advertising rose by 4.5 percent, but didn’t even come close to making up for the 7.5 percent decline in print advertising, which still accounts for about 70 percent of the company’s overall ad revenue.

To add insult to injury, the company’s former star online performer — About.com, which has produced consistent revenues for the NYT since the company acquired it in 2005 for 5 million — got hit by Google’s recent “content farm” algorithm updates: the unit’s revenues were down by more than 10 percent, and its operating profit fell by 14 percent. That’s not as bad as the impact likely was on Demand Media, but it’s still not good.

In a statement, CEO Janet Robinson said that the results reflect “the continuing transformation of our company,” and that the subscription plan and other developments offer “reason for optimism about the future of our company.” But it’s hard to see how even million is enough to produce much optimism, since that won’t make up even a fraction of the ongoing decline in print advertising.

There are those in the media industry who appear to have made the transition from traditional media to new media, or are closer to it than the Times: the Journal-Register Co., under CEO John Paton, has revamped the entire company with a “digital first” approach, and recently paid staff bonuses based on its profitability. Unfortunately for the NYT, the chain of small dailies and weeklies couldn’t accomplish this without effectively going bankrupt first — just as the Christian Science Monitor couldn’t accomplish its transformation without shutting down its daily newspaper and focusing exclusively online.

Neither of those seem like realistic options for the New York Times, which is trapped between a shrinking traditional past and a digital future that doesn’t even come close to paying the bills. And the harsh reality is that there is no magic bullet, digital or otherwise, that is going to make that transition any easier.

Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr users jphilipg and Zarko Drincic

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):

  • NewNet Q1: Content Farms and Niche Networks on the Rise
  • NewNet Q1: Content Farms and Niche Networks on the Rise
  • What the New York Times Can Learn From Rupert Murdoch’s Paywall



alt='IDrive Online Backup: Don’t spend your time recovering from disaster.'
border='0' width='300' height='250'
/>


GigaOM


Hylas 1 completes testing, Europe’s first broadband satellite to start serving customers next week

Posted by on Tuesday, 15 March, 2011
It hasn’t exactly been all that long since Avanti Communications’ Hylas 1 satellite blasted off at the end of November, but it’s now almost ready to start spreading some wireless broadband across 16 countries in Europe. Avanti just announced today that the satellite’s in-orbit testing phase has been a “complete success,” and that it will go into service sometime next week with an initial test group of customers, before beginning a broader transition on April 4th. All told, over 60 operators have signed up to offer the satellite broadband service to customers, which promises to offer connections of up to 10Mbps to folks in even the most rural areas. It’s also only just the beginning — Avanti plans to launch Hylas 2 sometime in the second quarter of 2012, which will extend its coverage to Africa and the Middle East.

[Thanks, Brett]

Continue reading Hylas 1 completes testing, Europe’s first broadband satellite to start serving customers next week

Hylas 1 completes testing, Europe’s first broadband satellite to start serving customers next week originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:44:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Stockopedia News  |   | Email this | Comments
Engadget


Duncan Jones Dodges Sophomore Slump With Source Code’s Softer Sci-Fi

Posted by on Saturday, 12 March, 2011

As his follow-up to critical hit Moon premieres at SXSW, the director laughs off nerves as he makes the transition from indie darling to Hollywood helmer. While not as heady as Jones’ first film, new techno-thriller Source Code reveals a remarkably confident director with a knack for telling gorgeous sci-fi stories.



Wired Top Stories